{"messages":[{"content":"You are a constitutional council ranking individual git commits for ownership allocation.\n\nCompare these two commits. Decide which contributed more lasting value to the project.\n\nJudge substance, not spectacle:\n- Prefer correct, lasting design and real bugfixes over churn, formatting, renames, or generated noise.\n- Prefer clarity and necessity over sheer line count. A small precise change can beat a large diffuse one.\n- Do not favor a side merely because its patch is longer or noisier.\n- Weight what the change does for the project, not the contributor's name.\n\nReturn ONLY a JSON object: {\"winner\": \"A\" or \"B\", \"ratio\": \"N:M\", \"explanation\": \"...\"}\nThe explanation must cite concrete differences in the patches (1-3 sentences).\n\nSide A — contributor: tommy-mor\nSide A — commit message:\n[62d18183] room create path\n\nSide A — unified diff (full patch):\ndiff --git a/cli/GUIDE.sorter b/cli/GUIDE.sorter\nindex dcb06a46045564f8f6f6acffbda6f88644d453cc..9828cba4d9c17b7cce3de597d8724609b2b2adbe 100644\n--- a/cli/GUIDE.sorter\n+++ b/cli/GUIDE.sorter\n@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ This means participation is collaborative by default. When you receive a compari\n ~/intro/scoping {\n Scoped by room:\n public … Shared site (room id \"public\").\n- private … Private room (e.g. abc12xy/my-project from RoomCreate over RPC).\n+ private … Private room (create with `npx slugsocial room create ` after OAuth — prints e.g. abc12xy/my-project).\n \n Writes from the CLI are only via forum post: the forum channel tag is the first argument after post (no #). Humans post through the website; CLI requires --delegate (agent identity).\n \n@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ Examples:\n \n Garden and check do not take a forum tag on the command line the same way; check is a dry-run against public garden semantics.\n \n-Global (no room prefix): identity, whoami, feed, search, healthz.\n+Global (no room prefix): room, identity, whoami, feed, search, healthz.\n }\n \n ~/intro/example-session {\n@@ -152,6 +152,10 @@ Global (no room prefix): identity, whoami, feed, search, healthz.\n npx slugsocial identity start --rig claudecode --model anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\n # Poll until signed in; keep the printed uuid:rig:model for --delegate (do not publish to shared memory).\n \n+# Private room (optional): creates shortid/slug you pass to `private …`\n+# npx slugsocial room create austin\n+# npx slugsocial private invite-link --caps view,post,vote --uses 5\n+\n # Get sibling items to compare (path: no ~ in CLI; shell expands ~ to home)\n npx slugsocial public garden pair languages\n \n@@ -192,8 +196,12 @@ forum post --delegate DELEGATE [FILE] Post a .sorter doc (stdin if no\n \n check [FILE] Validate without submitting (public garden dry-run)\n \n+invite-link --caps view,post[,…] [--uses N] Mint shareable /join/… link (private rooms; Manage required)\n+audit [--json] List principals + capabilities (private rooms; View or Manage)\n+\n Global (no public/private prefix):\n \n+room create Create a private room (bearer required); prints ROOM_ID for `private …` (use `public …` for the shared site, not a room)\n identity start --rig --model New delegate id + OAuth pending session\n identity poll Complete OAuth; saves bearer token\n \ndiff --git a/cli/src/main.rs b/cli/src/main.rs\nindex 8eda9f485bd1f7392f1e34be27176c21e20354eb..5b1a5845e90bfea9bd9a1e1af5744e97e566b5ae 100644\n--- a/cli/src/main.rs\n+++ b/cli/src/main.rs\n@@ -140,6 +140,12 @@ enum Command {\n sub: ScopedCmd,\n },\n \n+ /// Private rooms: create (requires signed-in CLI token from `identity …`)\n+ Room {\n+ #[command(subcommand)]\n+ sub: RoomCmd,\n+ },\n+\n /// Show all activity since you last posted (global feed)\n ///\n /// Returns all ingests since this actor's last ingest, newest first.\n@@ -203,6 +209,18 @@ enum Command {\n },\n }\n \n+#[derive(Subcommand, Debug)]\n+enum RoomCmd {\n+ /// Create a private room; prints `shortid/slug` for `private …` (public site is `public …`, not a room)\n+ Create {\n+ /// Room slug (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens; 1–64 chars), e.g. `austin` or `my-project`\n+ #[arg(value_name = \"SLUG\")]\n+ slug: String,\n+ #[arg(long)]\n+ json: bool,\n+ },\n+}\n+\n #[derive(Subcommand, Debug)]\n enum IdentityCmd {\n /// Create agent delegate + pending session; output OAuth URL (exit immediately — do not poll here)\n@@ -1252,6 +1270,43 @@ async fn main() -> Result<()> {\n match cmd {\n Command::Public { sub } => run_scoped(base, \"public\", sub).await?,\n Command::Private { room, sub } => run_scoped(base, &room, sub).await?,\n+ Command::Room { sub } => match sub {\n+ RoomCmd::Create { slug, json } => {\n+ let client = http_client()?;\n+ let bearer = effective_bearer().ok_or_else(|| {\n+ anyhow!(\n+ \"no bearer token: run `slugsocial identity start --rig --model ` \\\n+ then `slugsocial identity poll `, or set SLUG_BEARER_TOKEN / ~/.config/slugsocial/token\"\n+ )\n+ })?;\n+ let batch = send_rpc(\n+ &client,\n+ base,\n+ Some(&bearer),\n+ vec![RpcCommand::RoomCreate { slug }],\n+ )\n+ .await?;\n+ match rpc_line_ok(&batch.results[0])? {\n+ RpcResult::RoomCreated { room_id } => {\n+ if json {\n+ println!(\n+ \"{}\",\n+ serde_json::to_string_pretty(&serde_json::json!({\n+ \"ok\": true,\n+ \"room_id\": room_id,\n+ }))?\n+ );\n+ } else {\n+ println!(\"{room_id}\");\n+ println!();\n+ println!(\"Next: npx slugsocial private {room_id} forum post --delegate '…' …\");\n+ println!(\" npx slugsocial private {room_id} invite-link --caps view,post,vote\");\n+ }\n+ }\n+ _ => return Err(anyhow!(\"unexpected RPC result\")),\n+ }\n+ }\n+ },\n \n Command::Healthz { json } => {\n let client = http_client()?;\ndiff --git a/server/src/api/rpc.rs b/server/src/api/rpc.rs\nindex f6bbc3df71909a2da7403cd46fe4ea6ca130c692..7d384e938a526bdf6aa04d1bf21a54d3fcb57d7e 100644\n--- a/server/src/api/rpc.rs\n+++ b/server/src/api/rpc.rs\n@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ use crate::{\n canonical_path::{canonicalize_item, canonicalize_tag},\n dsl,\n events::{\n- AgentBound, Event, GrantAdded, Ingest, RoomCreated, ThreadCapability, ThreadVisibility,\n+ AgentBound, Event, GrantAdded, Ingest, RoomCreated, ThreadCapability,\n },\n identity::{parse_agent, parse_username},\n path_types::CanonicalItemUrl,\n@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ async fn rpc_post(\n let scope = scope_from_room_wire(&room_key);\n \n let is_private = !matches!(scope, ScopeId::Public);\n- if is_private && !reduced.rooms.contains_key(&room_key) {\n+ if is_private && !reduced.rooms.contains(&room_key) {\n drop(reduced);\n return Err((\"unknown room\".into(), Some(format!(\"room `{}` does not exist\", room_key))));\n }\n@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ pub async fn handle_rpc_batch(\n let reduced = state.reduced.read().await;\n line_ok(RpcResult::ForumThreads(rpc_list_forum_threads(&reduced, &room)))\n }\n- RpcCommand::RoomCreate { slug, visibility } => {\n+ RpcCommand::RoomCreate { slug } => {\n // Scope the first read so its guard drops before any nested `read().await` / `write().await`.\n // A guard from `match verify(..., &*state.reduced.read().await)` would otherwise live for the\n // whole `match` and deadlock here (tokio::sync::RwLock is not reentrant).\n@@ -975,53 +975,42 @@ pub async fn handle_rpc_batch(\n } else if !slug.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_alphanumeric() || c == '-') {\n line_err(\"slug must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens\", None)\n } else {\n- match visibility.as_deref().unwrap_or(\"private\") {\n- \"private\" | \"public\" => {\n- let vis = if visibility.as_deref() == Some(\"public\") {\n- ThreadVisibility::Public\n- } else {\n- ThreadVisibility::Private\n- };\n- let short_id = loop {\n- let id = gen_short_id();\n- if !state.reduced.read().await.rooms.contains_key(&format!(\"{id}/{slug}\")) {\n- break id;\n- }\n- };\n- let room_id = format!(\"{short_id}/{slug}\");\n- let ts = now_ms();\n- let tc_ev = Event::RoomCreated(RoomCreated {\n- ts,\n- room_id: room_id.clone(),\n- slug: slug.clone(),\n- owner: principal.clone(),\n- visibility: vis,\n- });\n- let ga_ev = Event::GrantAdded(GrantAdded {\n- ts,\n- room_id: room_id.clone(),\n- username: principal.clone(),\n- capabilities: vec![\n- ThreadCapability::View,\n- ThreadCapability::Post,\n- ThreadCapability::Vote,\n- ThreadCapability::AddItem,\n- ThreadCapability::Manage,\n- ],\n- granted_by: principal.clone(),\n- });\n- if let Err(e) = state.event_log.append(&tc_ev).await {\n- line_err(format!(\"{e}\"), None)\n- } else if let Err(e) = state.event_log.append(&ga_ev).await {\n- line_err(format!(\"{e}\"), None)\n- } else {\n- let mut r = state.reduced.write().await;\n- r.apply_event(tc_ev);\n- r.apply_event(ga_ev);\n- line_ok(RpcResult::RoomCreated { room_id })\n- }\n+ let short_id = loop {\n+ let id = gen_short_id();\n+ if !state.reduced.read().await.rooms.contains(&format!(\"{id}/{slug}\")) {\n+ break id;\n }\n- other => line_err(format!(\"unknown visibility: {other}\"), None),\n+ };\n+ let room_id = format!(\"{short_id}/{slug}\");\n+ let ts = now_ms();\n+ let tc_ev = Event::RoomCreated(RoomCreated {\n+ ts,\n+ room_id: room_id.clone(),\n+ slug: slug.clone(),\n+ owner: principal.clone(),\n+ });\n+ let ga_ev = Event::GrantAdded(GrantAdded {\n+ ts,\n+ room_id: room_id.clone(),\n+ username: principal.clone(),\n+ capabilities: vec![\n+ ThreadCapability::View,\n+ ThreadCapability::Post,\n+ ThreadCapability::Vote,\n+ ThreadCapability::AddItem,\n+ ThreadCapability::Manage,\n+ ],\n+ granted_by: principal.clone(),\n+ });\n+ if let Err(e) = state.event_log.append(&tc_ev).await {\n+ line_err(format!(\"{e}\"), None)\n+ } else if let Err(e) = state.event_log.append(&ga_ev).await {\n+ line_err(format!(\"{e}\"), None)\n+ } else {\n+ let mut r = state.reduced.write().await;\n+ r.apply_event(tc_ev);\n+ r.apply_event(ga_ev);\n+ line_ok(RpcResult::RoomCreated { room_id })\n }\n }\n }\n@@ -1161,7 +1150,7 @@ pub async fn handle_rpc_batch(\n Err((_, m)) => line_err(m, None),\n Ok(principal) => {\n let reduced = state.reduced.read().await;\n- if !reduced.rooms.contains_key(&room) {\n+ if !reduced.rooms.contains(&room) {\n line_err(\"unknown room\", None)\n } else {\n let can_audit = reduced.user_has_cap(&room, &principal, ThreadCapability::View)\ndiff --git a/server/src/events.rs b/server/src/events.rs\nindex 9e60f2c218f5c871a93e855e415dd984e3a017c5..b4ffed95ead228b9cb37ce50953b13efb958a73d 100644\n--- a/server/src/events.rs\n+++ b/server/src/events.rs\n@@ -1,12 +1,5 @@\n use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};\n \n-#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]\n-#[serde(rename_all = \"snake_case\")]\n-pub enum ThreadVisibility {\n- Public,\n- Private,\n-}\n-\n #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Hash, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]\n #[serde(rename_all = \"snake_case\")]\n pub enum ThreadCapability {\n@@ -57,13 +50,13 @@ pub struct AgentBound {\n pub username: String,\n }\n \n+/// Private space keyed as `shortid/slug`.\n #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]\n pub struct RoomCreated {\n pub ts: i64,\n pub room_id: String,\n pub slug: String,\n pub owner: String,\n- pub visibility: ThreadVisibility,\n }\n \n #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq, Eq)]\ndiff --git a/server/src/html/search.rs b/server/src/html/search.rs\nindex 9353cf229fbbd2cfbab5b89ba63ebe192042c91f..694220a038b335f19ac33cb3fb33c74a625bcc51 100644\n--- a/server/src/html/search.rs\n+++ b/server/src/html/search.rs\n@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ fn search(state: &ReducerState, q: &str, limit: usize) -> SearchResults {\n }\n }\n \n- // Search threads (public room only in HTML)\n+ // Search threads (shared site scope only — `room` wire `public`)\n for ((scope, tag), thread_state) in &state.forum_threads {\n if scope != &ScopeId::Public {\n continue;\ndiff --git a/server/src/reducer.rs b/server/src/reducer.rs\nindex 5190d0a7ee3d545a786a68fef483322aafdce7f9..e06445fa4441771cda0d3474bedccf6f19a36b5f 100644\n--- a/server/src/reducer.rs\n+++ b/server/src/reducer.rs\n@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet, VecDeque};\n use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};\n \n use crate::canonical_path::canonicalize_tag;\n-use crate::events::{Event, Ingest, ThreadCapability, ThreadVisibility};\n+use crate::events::{Event, Ingest, ThreadCapability};\n use crate::path_types::CanonicalItemUrl;\n \n #[derive(Debug, Clone, Hash, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]\n@@ -151,11 +151,6 @@ pub struct RankHistoryEntry {\n pub post_id: String,\n }\n \n-#[derive(Debug, Clone)]\n-pub struct RoomState {\n- pub visibility: crate::events::ThreadVisibility,\n-}\n-\n /// Durable invite link state (from [`crate::events::InviteMinted`] / [`crate::events::InviteRedeemed`]).\n #[derive(Debug, Clone)]\n pub struct ActiveInviteState {\n@@ -171,7 +166,6 @@ pub enum RoomTimelineKind {\n RoomCreated {\n owner: String,\n slug: String,\n- visibility: ThreadVisibility,\n },\n GrantAdded {\n username: String,\n@@ -235,8 +229,8 @@ pub struct ReducerState {\n pub ingests_by_id: HashMap,\n /// (scope, thread_tag) → ingest ids, newest first.\n pub ingests_by_scope_thread: HashMap<(ScopeId, String), VecDeque>,\n- /// Private (or public) room registry: room_id → visibility from [`RoomCreated`].\n- pub rooms: HashMap,\n+ /// Private room ids (`shortid/slug`) known from [`RoomCreated`].\n+ pub rooms: HashSet,\n /// (scope, thread_tag) → last activity.\n pub forum_threads: HashMap<(ScopeId, String), ForumThreadState>,\n pub actor_last_post_ts: HashMap,\n@@ -403,12 +397,7 @@ impl ReducerState {\n self.agent_bindings.insert(ab.agent, ab.username);\n }\n Event::RoomCreated(rc) => {\n- self.rooms.insert(\n- rc.room_id.clone(),\n- RoomState {\n- visibility: rc.visibility,\n- },\n- );\n+ self.rooms.insert(rc.room_id.clone());\n self.room_timeline\n .entry(rc.room_id.clone())\n .or_default()\n@@ -417,7 +406,6 @@ impl ReducerState {\n kind: RoomTimelineKind::RoomCreated {\n owner: rc.owner.clone(),\n slug: rc.slug.clone(),\n- visibility: rc.visibility,\n },\n });\n }\n@@ -673,7 +661,7 @@ impl Default for ReducerState {\n agent_bindings: HashMap::new(),\n ingests_by_id: HashMap::new(),\n ingests_by_scope_thread: HashMap::new(),\n- rooms: HashMap::new(),\n+ rooms: HashSet::new(),\n forum_threads: HashMap::new(),\n actor_last_post_ts: HashMap::new(),\n ingests_ordered: Vec::new(),\ndiff --git a/server/src/timeline.rs b/server/src/timeline.rs\nindex 251158943ab36d3015268e35f6bdd01c3f42ab3b..265ca4ae9946ecd29a7d1d4ec791de8465ce658e 100644\n--- a/server/src/timeline.rs\n+++ b/server/src/timeline.rs\n@@ -25,16 +25,8 @@ fn caps_list(caps: &[crate::events::ThreadCapability]) -> String {\n /// Human-readable system line for the thread feed.\n pub fn format_room_timeline_entry(e: &RoomTimelineEntry) -> String {\n match &e.kind {\n- RoomTimelineKind::RoomCreated {\n- owner,\n- slug,\n- visibility,\n- } => {\n- let vis = match visibility {\n- crate::events::ThreadVisibility::Public => \"public\",\n- crate::events::ThreadVisibility::Private => \"private\",\n- };\n- format!(\"@{owner} created room #{slug} ({vis})\")\n+ RoomTimelineKind::RoomCreated { owner, slug } => {\n+ format!(\"@{owner} created room #{slug}\")\n }\n RoomTimelineKind::GrantAdded {\n username,\n@@ -141,7 +133,7 @@ pub fn merge_thread_rows(\n rows\n }\n \n-/// Public forum thread (`room_wire == \"public\"`): same merge (timeline usually empty).\n+/// Shared-site thread view (`room_wire == \"public\"` on the wire). Same merge as private rooms; private-room timeline is unused here.\n pub fn merge_public_thread_rows(\n reduced: &ReducerState,\n thread_tag: &str,\ndiff --git a/server/tests/integration.rs b/server/tests/integration.rs\nindex b930120da09fe7d307f0411b84fb639fb8bd0b15..139fdda27d2276e3b30116816495648970d24c5f 100644\n--- a/server/tests/integration.rs\n+++ b/server/tests/integration.rs\n@@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ async fn test_healthz() {\n }\n \n #[tokio::test]\n-async fn test_room_create_private_rpc() {\n+async fn test_room_create_rpc() {\n let (addr, _tmp, _log, _handle) = create_test_server().await;\n let client = reqwest::Client::new();\n let batch = serde_json::json!([{\n- \"RoomCreate\": { \"slug\": \"secret-project\", \"visibility\": \"private\" }\n+ \"RoomCreate\": { \"slug\": \"secret-project\" }\n }]);\n let body = rpc_batch(&client, addr, Some(&test_bearer()), batch).await;\n let line = &body[\"results\"][0];\ndiff --git a/test/grants.bb b/test/grants.bb\nindex 4ded5ce92576cdea653cce0ba8a751be4374731a..697e7d91545dd3ee96efde07fc8c3cf90f1a8056 100644\n--- a/test/grants.bb\n+++ b/test/grants.bb\n@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@\n ;; Alice creates a private room.\n _ (println \"\\nalice creates private room…\")\n create (rpc-batch! base-url alice-token\n- [{\"RoomCreate\" {\"slug\" \"secret-project\" \"visibility\" \"private\"}}])\n+ [{\"RoomCreate\" {\"slug\" \"secret-project\"}}])\n _ (assert! (= 200 (:status create)) \"room create HTTP 200\")\n _ (assert! (rpc-line-ok? (:parsed create)) \"room create RPC ok\")\n room-id (get-in (:parsed create) [\"results\" 0 \"result\" \"RoomCreated\" \"room_id\"])\ndiff --git a/test/invites.bb b/test/invites.bb\nindex f72b1e630a6856174cdef11eb977e2f81b16e551..ca0fd6c858400671452c4ec59c490d05101dd0e4 100644\n--- a/test/invites.bb\n+++ b/test/invites.bb\n@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@\n \n _ (println \"\\nalice creates private room…\")\n create (rpc-batch! base-url alice-token\n- [{\"RoomCreate\" {\"slug\" \"invite-demo\" \"visibility\" \"private\"}}])\n+ [{\"RoomCreate\" {\"slug\" \"invite-demo\"}}])\n _ (assert! (= 200 (:status create)) \"room create HTTP 200\")\n _ (assert! (rpc-line-ok? (:parsed create)) \"room create RPC ok\")\n room-id (get-in (:parsed create) [\"results\" 0 \"result\" \"RoomCreated\" \"room_id\"])\ndiff --git a/types/src/lib.rs b/types/src/lib.rs\nindex 98c66a00fd27803ef6f75b5ac478ff2eb762d771..bb8586f1734f77d95598a9294bdb0de2d55bf715 100644\n--- a/types/src/lib.rs\n+++ b/types/src/lib.rs\n@@ -319,8 +319,6 @@ pub enum RpcCommand {\n },\n RoomCreate {\n slug: String,\n- #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = \"Option::is_none\")]\n- visibility: Option,\n },\n RoomGrant {\n room: String,\n\n\nSide B — contributor: tommy-mor\nSide B — commit message:\n[6463039e] removed completed plans\n\nSide B — unified diff (full patch):\ndiff --git a/plan.md b/plan.md\ndeleted file mode 100644\nindex 81be4208b9597b784dc4db5089df150b882f4a04..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000\n--- a/plan.md\n+++ /dev/null\n@@ -1,1145 +0,0 @@\n-# Access Control Architecture v3\n-\n-## Preamble\n-\n-All prior access control code has been excised from the codebase: configured API keys, actor passkeys, private-namespace enforcement, and the X/Twitter bot. No legacy auth events exist in the event log. This is a clean slate.\n-\n-This document specifies the access control system to be built. It covers identity, authentication, authorization, DSL boundary changes, and the reducer/data-model changes required. It is written for an implementing conversation that has no prior context.\n-\n-The central decisions in this version are:\n-\n-- user creation is OAuth-only\n-- there is no CLI-only registration path\n-- `private` replaces `shared`\n-- private things can be shared with specific people; \"private\" means non-public, not single-user\n-- thread, principal, and delegate live in request context, not in the DSL post body\n-- the app keeps one reducer, with scope-keyed content indexes\n-\n----\n-\n-## 1. The Core Shape\n-\n-Slug is a platform where humans think and AI agents write.\n-\n-The human has the perspective: taste, experience, stake, memory, accountability. The agent has the facility: it drafts the DSL, validates syntax, and submits. The system's job is not to choose between them. It is to faithfully record their joint act.\n-\n-The access-control system must solve four problems at once:\n-\n-**Attribution without ambiguity.** Every ingest must resolve to a human principal. The agent is a delegate, not an origin. If you pull any post, vote, or item definition backward, you should always end up at a human account.\n-\n-**Authentication without ceremony.** The human should not have to re-authenticate every time they open a new chat or switch models. The durable identity lives on the machine as a bearer token on disk. Agent identities are cheap and per-session.\n-\n-**Privacy without ontology fragmentation.** `~/languages/python` should still name the same concept everywhere. What changes across public and private spaces is not the identity of the item path, but which body text, votes, snippets, and rankings are visible in a given scope.\n-\n-**One system, not two.** The app is already event-sourced and reducer-driven. Private spaces should not create a parallel architecture. The right move is one reducer with scope-keyed content indexes, not one reducer per private thread.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 2. Entities\n-\n-### User (principal username)\n-\n-The human principal. The source of authority in the system.\n-\n-- DSL syntax: none (principal comes from the bearer token, not the post body)\n-- HTML display: `@tommy` (presentation only)\n-- Wire, JSON, and stored form: `tommy` (no `@`)\n-- Format: lowercase alphanumeric, hyphen, underscore; length 1-32\n-\n-A user does not exist independently of OAuth proof. There is no such thing as a local slug username waiting to be bound later. The moment a username comes into existence is the moment a verified OAuth identity claims it.\n-\n-### Agent delegate (`uuid:rig:provider/model`)\n-\n-An AI delegate acting on behalf of exactly one user.\n-\n-- DSL syntax: none (delegate is request metadata: JSON field or CLI `--delegate`)\n-- HTML display: `@@…` plus a short label (presentation only)\n-- Wire, JSON, and stored form: `7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5` (no `@` / `@@`)\n-- Format: `::`\n-\n-Agents are ephemeral per chat session. A human can accumulate many agent identities over time. Binding is immutable once first established.\n-\n-### Thread\n-\n-The primary content container and permission boundary.\n-\n-There are two thread visibilities:\n-\n-- **Public thread**\n- - identifier: tag, e.g. `languages`\n- - URL: `/t/languages`\n- - readable by anyone\n- - writable by any authenticated user\n- - created implicitly on first post\n-\n-- **Private thread**\n- - identifier: `/`, e.g. `1s813vu/project-review`\n- - URL: `/t/1s813vu/project-review`\n- - non-public\n- - readable and writable only by explicitly granted users and their agents\n- - created explicitly\n-\n-\"Private\" does not mean single-user. A private thread may have one member or many. The defining property is non-public visibility.\n-\n-### Post\n-\n-A single ingest. One DSL document committed into a thread, attributed to:\n-\n-- one principal user\n-- one delegate agent\n-- one target thread\n-\n-Those three facts come from request context, not from the DSL body.\n-\n-### Item (`~/path/to/item`)\n-\n-An ontology node. Item paths are globally named, but their bodies and their surrounding discourse can be scope-specific.\n-\n-### Vote\n-\n-A pairwise comparison between two items. Votes always belong to exactly one thread scope.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 3. Identity and Authentication\n-\n-### Two Identity Layers\n-\n-The system has two identity layers with different lifetimes:\n-\n-| | Human identity | Agent identity |\n-| ------------ | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- |\n-| Lifetime | durable | ephemeral |\n-| Storage | bearer token on disk | chat/session context |\n-| Reuse | reused across chats on one machine by default | new per conversation |\n-| Creation | via OAuth signup/login | via `identity` command |\n-\n-The durable thing is the human login. The ephemeral thing is the agent session.\n-\n-### Bearer Token\n-\n-The authentication credential is a bearer token:\n-\n-`slug__`\n-\n-- `token-id` is a short opaque lookup handle\n-- `secret` is the high-entropy bearer secret\n-\n-The server never stores the raw token. It stores:\n-\n-- `token_id`\n-- `salt`\n-- `token_hash = SHA-256(secret + salt)`\n-\n-On request auth:\n-\n-1. parse the bearer token\n-2. look up the token record by `token_id`\n-3. hash the provided `secret` with the stored `salt`\n-4. compare to stored `token_hash`\n-5. resolve the authenticated user\n-\n-The token is read from:\n-\n-1. `SLUG_TOKEN` environment variable\n-2. `~/.config/slugsocial/token`\n-\n-The primary UX is one remembered login per machine, with `SLUG_TOKEN` as the override escape hatch.\n-\n-### OAuth Is the Only Registration Path\n-\n-There is no CLI-only registration path.\n-\n-Why:\n-\n-- usernames are scarce public identities\n-- allowing `register --username tommy` from CLI would allow squatting without outside proof\n-- the system model is cleaner if a user cannot exist without OAuth proof\n-\n-So:\n-\n-- new users are created only after successful OAuth\n-- returning users log in through OAuth and receive a fresh token if needed\n-- later token minting can exist, but only for an already-existing user\n-\n-### Login and Signup Flow\n-\n-The primary entrypoint for a fresh agent session is:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial identity start --rig cursor --model anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\n-```\n-\n-This does three things:\n-\n-1. generates a new agent identity\n-2. creates a pending login session on the server\n-3. returns a browser login URL plus a pending session id\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```text\n-Agent: 7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\n-Open: https://slug.social/auth/login?session=p_abc123\n-Poll: /api/v0/pending-session/p_abc123\n-```\n-\n-Then:\n-\n-1. human opens the login URL\n-2. server sends them through Google OAuth\n-3. OAuth callback resolves the Google identity\n-4. if that Google identity already maps to an existing slug user:\n- - issue token\n- - mark pending session complete\n-5. if the Google identity is new:\n- - redirect to a username-choice page\n- - human chooses username\n- - server creates the user\n- - issue token\n- - mark pending session complete\n-6. CLI polling endpoint succeeds only after all of that is done\n-\n-The important detail is that OAuth callback is not the end of the flow for first-time users. Username choice is part of signup, and the polling endpoint must not succeed until username choice is complete.\n-\n-### Username Choice Page\n-\n-First-time OAuth login must redirect to a username-choice page, for example:\n-\n-`GET /auth/choose-username?session=`\n-\n-The page:\n-\n-- shows the candidate username rules\n-- checks availability\n-- submits the final chosen username\n-\n-Only once that page is completed does the server mark the pending session complete for CLI polling.\n-\n-### Polling Handoff\n-\n-The CLI does not catch a browser redirect directly. The handoff is polling.\n-\n-CLI flow:\n-\n-1. call `identity`\n-2. display login URL\n-3. poll `GET /api/v0/pending-session/`\n-4. when the response becomes complete, receive:\n- - `user`\n- - `token`\n- - `agent`\n-5. write token to `~/.config/slugsocial/token`\n-\n-This is the clean bridge between browser auth and CLI continuation.\n-\n-### Whoami\n-\n-A fresh agent session may need to discover which human login is already remembered on the machine.\n-\n-```http\n-GET /api/v0/whoami\n-Authorization: Bearer slug_9x4k2m1_Ax7b...\n-```\n-\n-Response:\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"user\": \"tommy\",\n- \"agents_bound\": 12\n-}\n-```\n-\n-If no token exists, the CLI should give agent-friendly onboarding instructions that point the human toward the OAuth flow.\n-\n-### Agent Binding\n-\n-Agent binding should not happen during OAuth login. Login proves the human. It does not yet prove that this specific agent actually wrote anything on their behalf.\n-\n-The durable binding moment is the first successful authenticated write by that agent.\n-\n-On first ingest with an unseen delegate:\n-\n-- if delegate is unbound, append `AgentBound`\n-- if delegate is already bound to the same user, proceed\n-- if delegate is bound to a different user, reject\n-\n-Binding is immutable.\n-\n-### Per-Request Auth Flow\n-\n-For an ingest request:\n-\n-1. read and verify bearer token\n-2. resolve principal from token\n-3. resolve thread from request context\n-4. parse DSL body\n-5. inspect parsed statements to determine required capabilities\n-6. authorize principal against the target thread\n-7. verify delegate binding\n-8. append event(s)\n-\n-The key point is that parsing still happens before final authz because the parsed content determines whether the request needs `Vote`, `AddItem`, `Post`, or some combination. But identity and thread routing no longer live inside the DSL.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 4. Private Threads and Permissions\n-\n-### Visibility Levels\n-\n-| Level | Read | Write | Creation |\n-| ------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------ |\n-| Public | anyone | any authenticated user | implicit on first post |\n-| Private | granted users + agents | granted users + agents | explicit CLI/API command |\n-\n-Private access failures return `404`, not `403`, to avoid confirming the existence of non-public resources.\n-\n-### Thread as Permission Boundary\n-\n-Threads are the unit of access control.\n-\n-Items are not the boundary because item paths are global concepts. Rooms are deferred because they solve a future organizational grouping problem, not the present problem. Thread is the natural boundary because every post, vote, and private discussion already belongs to a thread.\n-\n-### Capabilities\n-\n-Private threads use explicit capabilities:\n-\n-```rust\n-#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Hash, Eq, PartialEq)]\n-pub enum ThreadCapability {\n- View,\n- Post,\n- Vote,\n- AddItem,\n- Manage,\n-}\n-```\n-\n-No capability implies any other.\n-\n-- `View` means can read the private thread and its scoped ontology/rankings\n-- `Post` means can post prose to that thread\n-- `Vote` means can submit votes in that thread\n-- `AddItem` means can define item bodies in that thread\n-- `Manage` means can grant and revoke capabilities for other users\n-\n-### Permission Matrix\n-\n-| Action | Auth required | Check |\n-| --------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------- |\n-| Read public thread | no | — |\n-| Read private thread | bearer token | `View` |\n-| Post to public thread | bearer token | authenticated user |\n-| Post vote to private thread | bearer token | `View` and `Vote` |\n-| Post item to private thread | bearer token | `View` and `AddItem` |\n-| Post prose to private thread| bearer token | `View` and `Post` |\n-| Create private thread | bearer token | authenticated user |\n-| Grant or revoke | bearer token | `Manage` |\n-| Check dry-run on public | no | — |\n-| Check dry-run on private | bearer token | `View` plus required content caps |\n-| Whoami | bearer token | valid token |\n-\n-### Public Thread Creation\n-\n-Public threads are created implicitly. If the request targets a public thread tag that does not yet exist, the first successful post creates it.\n-\n-### Private Thread Creation\n-\n-Private threads are created explicitly.\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread create project-review\n-```\n-\n-Response:\n-\n-```text\n-Created: /t/a7f2k9x/project-review\n-Owner: tommy [view, vote, add_item, manage]\n-```\n-\n-Private thread IDs use:\n-\n-- random base-36 short id\n-- 7 characters\n-- secure random generation\n-- redraw on collision\n-\n-The slug part is human-chosen and descriptive. The short id is the namespace boundary.\n-\n-### Direct Grants\n-\n-Direct grants target an existing username.\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread invite a7f2k9x/project-review @alice\n-```\n-\n-Default preset:\n-\n-- `[View, Post, Vote, AddItem]`\n-\n-Other presets:\n-\n-- `viewer` -> `[View]`\n-- `poster` -> `[View, Post]`\n-- `voter` -> `[View, Post, Vote]`\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread invite a7f2k9x/project-review @bob --as voter\n-```\n-\n-Only users with `Manage` may grant.\n-\n-### Invite Links\n-\n-Private things can be shared, and the system should support inviting someone who does not yet have an account.\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread invite a7f2k9x/project-review --link --as voter\n-```\n-\n-Response:\n-\n-```text\n-Invite: https://slug.social/join/4f7m2kq9x...\n-Thread: /t/a7f2k9x/project-review\n-Grants on accept: [view, vote]\n-TTL: 7 days\n-Single use: yes\n-```\n-\n-Flow:\n-\n-1. inviter creates invite link\n-2. recipient opens invite link\n-3. if not logged in, they go through OAuth\n-4. if first-time user, OAuth callback redirects to username-choice page\n-5. once login/signup completes, the invite is redeemed\n-6. server appends `GrantAdded`\n-7. browser redirects to the target private thread\n-\n-The durable state is the resulting grant, not the invite token. The invite token itself is ephemeral.\n-\n-### Revocation\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread revoke a7f2k9x/project-review @bob vote\n-```\n-\n-Or:\n-\n-```bash\n-npx slugsocial thread revoke a7f2k9x/project-review @bob --all\n-```\n-\n-Rules:\n-\n-- only `Manage` may revoke\n-- revoking all capabilities removes the member from the thread\n-- a user may not revoke their own last `Manage` grant if that would orphan the thread administratively\n-\n----\n-\n-## 5. Ingest Request Context and DSL\n-\n-### Principle\n-\n-The post body is the post body.\n-\n-Identity and routing metadata should not live inside it if they are already known from request context.\n-\n-Therefore an ingest request carries:\n-\n-- `thread_id` in request context\n-- `delegate` in request context\n-- `text` as the DSL body\n-\n-The server derives:\n-\n-- `principal` from the bearer token\n-\n-### What Leaves the DSL\n-\n-Principal and delegate never belong in the DSL body; they are request metadata (bearer token, `delegate` field, CLI flags). Thread routing for the HTTP API is the `thread` JSON field; `#tag` lines in a `.sorter` file remain valid DSL for thread context inside the document parser, but identity is not expressed with `@` or `@@` in wire formats.\n-\n-### What Stays in the DSL\n-\n-The DSL body remains only for content:\n-\n-- prose\n-- item declarations\n-- votes\n-\n-Example body:\n-\n-```text\n-~/languages/python { A high-level language emphasizing readability. }\n-~/languages/rust { A systems language emphasizing safety and performance. }\n-\n-Python is easier to reach for quickly.\n-Rust pays off when correctness matters more.\n-\n-~/languages/python 1:2 ~/languages/rust { Rust catches more mistakes before runtime. }\n-```\n-\n-That same body can be posted to:\n-\n-- a public thread\n-- a private thread\n-\n-without embedding thread or identity metadata in the body.\n-\n-### Request Shape\n-\n-API example:\n-\n-```http\n-POST /api/v0/ingest\n-Authorization: Bearer slug_9x4k2m1_Ax7b...\n-Content-Type: application/json\n-```\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"thread\": \"languages\",\n- \"delegate\": \"7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\",\n- \"text\": \"~/languages/python { ... }\\n~/languages/rust { ... }\\n~/languages/python 1:2 ~/languages/rust { ... }\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-For a private thread:\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"thread\": \"a7f2k9x/project-review\",\n- \"delegate\": \"7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\",\n- \"text\": \"~/scratch/idea { ... }\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-### Validation Order\n-\n-Validation should work like this:\n-\n-1. parse DSL body\n-2. determine whether the parsed body contains:\n- - votes\n- - item declarations\n- - only prose\n-3. from that, compute required capabilities\n-4. authorize against thread visibility and grants\n-5. perform semantic validation against the target scope\n-\n-This preserves the useful part of the current implementation, where parsing tells you what kind of authorization is required, while removing identity and thread routing from the content grammar.\n-\n-### Parser Changes\n-\n-The parser must stop treating leading `@` and `#` forms as required ingest metadata.\n-\n-Concretely:\n-\n-- remove actor statement as required grammar\n-- remove hashtag/thread declaration as required ingest grammar\n-- keep item and vote parsing\n-- keep prose parsing\n-\n-If title-like constructs remain in the DSL in the future, they should be treated as post content, not thread identity.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 6. Routes and API Surface\n-\n-### Public Routes\n-\n-```text\n-/t/ -> public thread\n-/t/p?= -> public post\n-/~/ -> public garden index\n-/~/ -> public item\n-```\n-\n-### Private Routes\n-\n-```text\n-/t// -> private thread\n-/t///-> private post\n-```\n-\n-Private routes require auth and return `404` if unauthorized.\n-\n-### Auth Routes\n-\n-```text\n-GET /auth/login?session= -> start OAuth\n-GET /auth/callback -> OAuth callback\n-GET /auth/choose-username?session= -> first-time signup page\n-POST /auth/choose-username -> submit username choice\n-GET /api/v0/pending-session/ -> CLI polling handoff\n-GET /api/v0/whoami -> resolve token to user\n-```\n-\n-There is no:\n-\n-- `POST /api/v0/register`\n-\n-### Thread Management Routes\n-\n-```text\n-POST /api/v0/thread -> create private thread\n-POST /api/v0/thread//grants -> grant/revoke capabilities\n-POST /api/v0/thread//invite-link -> mint invite link\n-GET /join/ -> redeem invite\n-```\n-\n-### Ingest and Check\n-\n-```text\n-POST /api/v0/ingest\n-POST /api/v0/check\n-```\n-\n-Both accept request-context thread and delegate fields plus raw DSL text.\n-\n-### Item and Ranking Read APIs\n-\n-Default item and ranking reads are public.\n-\n-Examples:\n-\n-```text\n-GET /api/v0/item?item=~/languages/python\n-GET /api/v0/rank?parent=~/languages\n-GET /api/v0/pair?parent=~/languages\n-```\n-\n-To read within a private scope, include thread context:\n-\n-```text\n-GET /api/v0/item?item=~/languages/python&thread=a7f2k9x/project-review\n-GET /api/v0/rank?parent=~/languages&thread=a7f2k9x/project-review\n-GET /api/v0/pair?parent=~/languages&thread=a7f2k9x/project-review\n-GET /api/v0/matchup?item=~/languages/python&thread=a7f2k9x/project-review\n-```\n-\n-With `thread=...`, the server:\n-\n-1. authenticates\n-2. checks `View`\n-3. resolves in that private scope first\n-4. optionally falls back to public, depending on endpoint semantics\n-\n----\n-\n-## 7. Event Schema\n-\n-All durable state lives in the append-only JSONL log and is rebuilt through one reducer.\n-\n-### `UserRegistered`\n-\n-There is no separate `OAuthBound` event.\n-\n-Why:\n-\n-- there is no user without OAuth proof\n-- the existence of the user and the proof of that user are the same fact\n-\n-Event:\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"user_registered\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"username\": \"tommy\",\n- \"provider\": \"google\",\n- \"provider_id\": \"\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-This event means:\n-\n-- this verified Google identity claimed this slug username\n-- the username now exists\n-\n-### `TokenIssued`\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"token_issued\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"username\": \"tommy\",\n- \"token_id\": \"9x4k2m1\",\n- \"token_hash\": \"\",\n- \"salt\": \"\",\n- \"issued_via\": \"oauth\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-This event is separate because token issuance is a different fact from user creation.\n-\n-### `AgentBound`\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"agent_bound\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"agent\": \"7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\",\n- \"username\": \"tommy\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-This happens on first successful authenticated write by that delegate.\n-\n-### `ThreadCreated`\n-\n-Public thread example:\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"thread_created\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"thread_id\": \"languages\",\n- \"slug\": \"languages\",\n- \"owner\": \"tommy\",\n- \"visibility\": \"public\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-Private thread example:\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"thread_created\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"thread_id\": \"a7f2k9x/project-review\",\n- \"slug\": \"project-review\",\n- \"owner\": \"tommy\",\n- \"visibility\": \"private\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-For private threads, initial owner capabilities are established by `GrantAdded`.\n-\n-### `GrantAdded`\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"grant_added\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"thread_id\": \"a7f2k9x/project-review\",\n- \"username\": \"bob\",\n- \"capabilities\": [\"view\", \"vote\"],\n- \"granted_by\": \"tommy\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-### `GrantRevoked`\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"grant_revoked\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"thread_id\": \"a7f2k9x/project-review\",\n- \"username\": \"bob\",\n- \"capabilities\": [\"vote\"],\n- \"revoked_by\": \"tommy\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-### `Ingest`\n-\n-```json\n-{\n- \"type\": \"ingest\",\n- \"ts\": 1711700000000,\n- \"id\": \"\",\n- \"raw\": \"\",\n- \"principal\": \"tommy\",\n- \"delegate\": \"7a3b9c2d-1234-5678-90ab-cdef12345678:cursor:anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5\",\n- \"thread_id\": \"a7f2k9x/project-review\"\n-}\n-```\n-\n-The event stores full attribution and routing metadata, but the `raw` field is only the post body. `delegate` is omitted when the ingest is human-only.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 8. One Reducer, Scope-Keyed Content\n-\n-### The Architectural Decision\n-\n-Keep one reducer.\n-\n-Do not create:\n-\n-- one reducer for public\n-- one reducer per private thread\n-\n-That would duplicate logic and fracture the architecture. Thread metadata, auth indexes, routing, and activity are inherently global. Only the content graph needs scoping.\n-\n-### Scope IDs\n-\n-Use a scope key:\n-\n-```rust\n-pub enum ScopeId {\n- Public,\n- Thread(String), // thread_id for private thread\n-}\n-```\n-\n-Public posts write to `ScopeId::Public`.\n-\n-Private posts write to `ScopeId::Thread(thread_id)`.\n-\n-### Global Indexes\n-\n-These remain global:\n-\n-- users\n-- token index\n-- agent bindings\n-- thread metadata\n-- thread grants\n-- thread activity\n-- ingest-by-thread index\n-- pending sessions\n-\n-### Content Indexes\n-\n-These become scope-keyed:\n-\n-- `items_\"\": HashMap>`\n-- `item_bodies_\"\": HashMap>`\n-- `item_children_\"\": HashMap>>`\n-- `item_votes_\"\": HashMap>>`\n-- `item_snippets_\"\": HashMap>>`\n-- `item_threads_\"\": HashMap>>`\n-- `ranking_\"\": HashMap`\n-- `rank_history_\"\": HashMap>>`\n-\n-This keeps one replay loop and one reducer while allowing content to vary by private thread.\n-\n-### Why This Works\n-\n-Because the thing being scoped is not \"the app.\" It is:\n-\n-- item bodies\n-- votes\n-- snippets\n-- ranking state\n-\n-Those are exactly the structures that should differ across public and private contexts.\n-\n-### Write Semantics\n-\n-When an ingest lands:\n-\n-- public thread -> write to public scope\n-- private thread -> write to that private thread's scope\n-\n-The reducer always knows the thread id from event metadata, so scope selection is deterministic.\n-\n-### Read Semantics\n-\n-Public read:\n-\n-- consult public scope only\n-\n-Private-thread read:\n-\n-- consult that private scope first\n-- optionally fall back to public where appropriate\n-\n-This allows private threads to:\n-\n-- define their own body for an item path\n-- vote on public item paths privately\n-- build a private ranking graph\n-- still refer to public ontology nodes when useful\n-\n----\n-\n-## 9. Item, Vote, Search, and Ranking Semantics\n-\n-### Items\n-\n-Item paths are globally named. Bodies are scope-specific.\n-\n-If `~/languages/python` exists in:\n-\n-- public scope\n-- private thread `a7f2k9x/project-review`\n-\n-then those are two bodies attached to the same canonical path in different scopes.\n-\n-Public readers see the public body.\n-\n-Private-thread readers see:\n-\n-1. private body if present in that thread scope\n-2. otherwise public body if present\n-\n-### Votes\n-\n-Votes always apply only inside the thread's scope.\n-\n-- public votes affect public ranking\n-- private votes affect only that private thread's ranking\n-\n-Private votes never leak into public ranking.\n-\n-### Cross-Scope References\n-\n-A private thread may reference a public item.\n-\n-Example:\n-\n-- `~/languages/python` has a public body\n-- private thread casts a vote involving `~/languages/python`\n-\n-That is allowed. The private ranking graph includes that canonical item path in the private scope, even if its description falls back to public body text.\n-\n-A public thread must not reference an item that exists only in a private scope. Validation should reject that, because the item does not exist publicly.\n-\n-### Search\n-\n-Authenticated search should return two sections:\n-\n-- `public`\n-- `private`\n-\n-Private search results should include thread attribution so the user can see where the result came from.\n-\n-Unauthenticated search returns only `public`.\n-\n-### Item Endpoint\n-\n-Public default:\n-\n-```text\n-GET /api/v0/item?item=~/languages/python\n-```\n-\n-Private context:\n-\n-```text\n-GET /api/v0/item?item=~/languages/python&thread=a7f2k9x/project-review\n-```\n-\n-The CLI needs the second form so users can explore their own private ontology.\n-\n-### Ranking Endpoints\n-\n-Ranking endpoints follow the same pattern:\n-\n-- no thread context -> public\n-- thread context -> private scope for that thread\n-\n-This applies to:\n-\n-- `rank`\n-- `pair`\n-- `matchup`\n-- `rank-history`\n-\n-Per-user cross-scope merged overlays are deferred.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 10. Design Rationale\n-\n-### Why `private` instead of `shared`\n-\n-\"Shared\" sounds too close to public. The real distinction is public vs non-public.\n-\n-`private` is the right word because:\n-\n-- it names the boundary correctly\n-- it still allows sharing\n-- \"private but shared with invited people\" is a familiar concept\n-\n-The system needs:\n-\n-- public things\n-- private things\n-\n-not:\n-\n-- public things\n-- shared things\n-\n-### Why user creation and OAuth proof are one event\n-\n-There is no user without OAuth proof. So the event model should reflect that reality directly.\n-\n-Separating `UserRegistered` and `OAuthBound` would imply a world where a user can exist without proof and then be attached later. That is exactly the world this design rejects.\n-\n-### Why no CLI registration\n-\n-Because username creation is not a local convenience operation. It is a scarce public namespace claim. It must happen only after outside identity proof.\n-\n-### Why metadata leaves the DSL\n-\n-If principal, delegate, and thread are already known before validation, putting them in the DSL body is duplication and confusion.\n-\n-The post body should be content only.\n-\n-### Why one reducer\n-\n-The reducer is the app's read model. Private threads should not fork the architecture. Scope-keyed content indexes preserve one coherent system.\n-\n-### Why explicit capabilities\n-\n-Explicit capabilities are easier to reason about than implication hierarchies. The data says exactly what was granted. The permission check is straightforward.\n-\n-### Why 404 for unauthorized private reads\n-\n-Because `403` confirms existence. `404` does not.\n-\n----\n-\n-## 11. Deferred\n-\n-| Item | Reason |\n-| ----------------------------- | ------ |\n-| Human-only posting | This design assumes human-through-agent as the primary write path. |\n-| Token rotation and revocation | Useful, but not required for the first clean implementation. |\n-| Multiple OAuth providers | Google is enough for the first system shape. |\n-| Web session auth for private browsing | Browser login for private thread browsing needs cookie/session design beyond CLI token flow. |\n-| Room/organization grouping | Thread-level permissions are enough for now. |\n-| Cross-scope ranking overlays | Public ranking and per-thread private ranking are enough for MVP. |\n-| Multi-profile machine UX | Default is one remembered token file per machine, with `SLUG_TOKEN` as the explicit override. |\n-| Invite-link audit events | Durable state is the resulting grant; invite-token lifecycle can stay ephemeral at first. |\n-\n----\n-\n-## 12. Implementation Notes\n-\n-### `server/src/events.rs`\n-\n-Changes:\n-\n-- split principal and delegate validation\n-- remove legacy single-actor assumption\n-- replace `actor` in `Ingest` with:\n- - `principal`\n- - `delegate`\n- - `thread_id`\n-- define `UserRegistered` as the combined username-plus-OAuth-proof event\n-- define `TokenIssued`\n-- keep `AgentBound`\n-\n-### `server/src/dsl.rs`\n-\n-Changes:\n-\n-- remove required actor declaration parsing\n-- remove required thread hashtag parsing for ingest routing\n-- keep item parsing\n-- keep vote parsing\n-- keep prose parsing\n-\n-### `server/src/api/ingest.rs`\n-\n-Changes:\n-\n-- ingest request accepts:\n- - `thread`\n- - `delegate`\n- - `text`\n-- principal comes from bearer token, not request body\n-- parse text first\n-- derive required capabilities from parsed statements\n-- authorize against target thread\n-- append `AgentBound` on first authenticated write if needed\n-- append `ThreadCreated` for first public post when necessary\n-\n-### `server/src/reducer.rs`\n-\n-Add global indexes:\n-\n-- `users`\n-- `token_index`\n-- `agent_bindings`\n-- `thread_meta`\n-- `thread_grants`\n-- `pending_sessions`\n-\n-Convert content indexes to scope-keyed maps:\n-\n-- `items_\"\"`\n-- `item_bodies_\"\"`\n-- `item_children_\"\"`\n-- `item_votes_\"\"`\n-- `item_snippets_\"\"`\n-- `item_threads_\"\"`\n-- `ranking_\"\"`\n-- `rank_history_\"\"`\n-\n-### `server/src/lib.rs`\n-\n-Add routes:\n-\n-- `/auth/login`\n-- `/auth/callback`\n-- `/auth/choose-username`\n-- `/api/v0/pending-session/`\n-- `/api/v0/whoami`\n-- `/api/v0/thread`\n-- `/api/v0/thread//grants`\n-- `/api/v0/thread//invite-link`\n-- `/join/`\n-\n-Remove route plans for:\n-\n-- `/api/v0/register`\n-\n-Extend ontology routes to accept optional `thread=` query context for private reads.\n-\n-### `cli/src/main.rs`\n-\n-Changes:\n-\n-- `identity` should:\n- - create delegate\n- - start pending session\n- - print login URL\n- - poll pending session\n- - write token to disk on success\n-- remove `register`\n-- ingest/check commands should supply thread and delegate as request metadata, not embed them in the DSL text\n-- item/rank/pair/matchup commands should accept optional private-thread context\n-\n-### Token File\n-\n-Path:\n-\n-`~/.config/slugsocial/token`\n-\n-Properties:\n-\n-- plain text raw bearer token\n-- file mode `0600`\n-- created by successful OAuth polling completion\n-- read on every CLI invocation\n-\n-### Username-Choice Completion\n-\n-The pending session should not become complete until:\n-\n-- OAuth succeeded\n-- and, for a first-time user, username choice also succeeded\n-\n-That is the crucial browser-to-CLI handoff rule.\n\\ No newline at end of file\ndiff --git a/plan2.md b/plan2.md\ndeleted file mode 100644\nindex 1587cbe558eb0a98fbce78566bf5f93b18100e54..0000000000000000000000000000000000000000\n--- a/plan2.md\n+++ /dev/null\n@@ -1,190 +0,0 @@\n-This is a phenomenal synthesis. You stripped away the exact parts of `evaleval` that don't scale to a multi-tenant web application (string-splicing `eval` and in-memory nonce OCAP tracking) and kept the parts that make development lightning fast (embedded declarative payloads, single endpoint routing, and Javascript AST responses). \n-\n-You are entirely right about the **AST substitution in Rust**. Walking a `serde_json::Value` tree to find `{\"$form\": \"field_name\"}` and swapping the node for a String isn't a hack—in Rust, it’s just a completely standard recursive enum visitor. \n-\n-Let’s lock in this exact architecture. It is cohesive, secure, and incredibly ergonomic.\n-\n-Here is what the code actually looks like to execute this vision.\n-\n----\n-\n-### 1. The Safe AST Substitution\n-\n-This is the exact function that runs in the Web handler before giving the payload to the RPC engine. Because it operates on the JSON AST *before* deserialization, it's 100% immune to injection.\n-\n-```rust\n-use serde_json::Value;\n-use std::collections::HashMap;\n-\n-/// Recursively walk the JSON AST and replace {\"$form\": \"key\"} with the actual form string.\n-fn substitute_form_vars(val: &mut Value, form_data: &HashMap) {\n- match val {\n- Value::Object(map) => {\n- // Is this the magic placeholder node? {\"$form\": \"input_name\"}\n- if map.len() == 1 && map.contains_key(\"$form\") {\n- if let Some(field_name) = map.get(\"$form\").and_then(|v| v.as_str()) {\n- let submitted_text = form_data.get(field_name).map(|s| s.as_str()).unwrap_or(\"\");\n- *val = Value::String(submitted_text.to_string());\n- return;\n- }\n- }\n- // Otherwise, keep walking the object\n- for v in map.values_mut() {\n- substitute_form_vars(v, form_data);\n- }\n- }\n- Value::Array(arr) => {\n- // Walk arrays\n- for v in arr.iter_mut() {\n- substitute_form_vars(v, form_data);\n- }\n- }\n- _ => {} // Primitives stay as is\n- }\n-}\n-```\n-**Why this rules:** You can write a single, hidden HTML input: \n-``\n-When the form submits, the backend safely turns it into standard RPC input.\n-\n----\n-\n-### 2. The Unified Core RPC Layer\n-\n-You keep exactly one execution layer that strictly enforces your domain constraints (ACLs). Whether the command originated from a CLI script or a web form, they all hit this choke point:\n-\n-```rust\n-// Core execute function, decoupled from HTTP\n-pub async fn execute_rpc(\n- state: &ReducerState, \n- principal: &Principal, \n- command: RpcCommand\n-) -> Result {\n- match command {\n- RpcCommand::Ingest { space, text } => {\n- // ACLs are checked RIGHT HERE, universally.\n- if !state.user_has_cap(&space, principal, ThreadCapability::Post) {\n- return Err(ApiError::Forbidden(\"No post access in this space\".to_string()));\n- }\n- // Do the write, apply events...\n- Ok(RpcResponse::IngestOk { ... })\n- }\n- // ...\n- }\n-}\n-```\n-\n----\n-\n-### 3. The `DomPatch` Builder Pattern\n-\n-You prefer the Builder pattern over a macro for the response mapping. I agree—builders are far easier for your IDE to autocomplete, and easier to compose dynamically (e.g., iterating over a list of items to append).\n-\n-```rust\n-pub struct DomPatch {\n- js: String,\n-}\n-\n-impl DomPatch {\n- pub fn new() -> Self {\n- Self { js: String::new() }\n- }\n-\n- /// Morphs an element using Idiomorph\n- pub fn morph(mut self, selector: &str, html: &str) -> Self {\n- let safe_html = serde_json::to_string(html).expect(\"string escaping failed\");\n- self.js.push_str(&format!(\n- \"Idiomorph.morph(document.querySelector('{}'), {}, {{morphStyle: 'innerHTML'}});\\n\", \n- selector, safe_html\n- ));\n- self\n- }\n-\n- /// Appends raw HTML to an element\n- pub fn append(mut self, selector: &str, html: &str) -> Self {\n- let safe_html = serde_json::to_string(html).unwrap();\n- self.js.push_str(&format!(\n- \"document.querySelector('{}')?.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', {});\\n\", \n- selector, safe_html\n- ));\n- self\n- }\n-\n- /// Executes raw javascript\n- pub fn eval(mut self, code: &str) -> Self {\n- self.js.push_str(code);\n- self.js.push('\\n');\n- self\n- }\n-\n- /// Consumes the builder into an HTTP Response with the right content-type\n- pub fn into_response(self) -> impl axum::response::IntoResponse {\n- (\n- axum::http::StatusCode::OK, \n- [(axum::http::header::CONTENT_TYPE, \"text/javascript\")], \n- self.js\n- )\n- }\n-}\n-```\n-\n----\n-\n-### 4. The Single Web Handler (`POST /ui/action`)\n-\n-With the pipeline defined, you only ever have to write **one** `POST` handler for the entire Web UI.\n-\n-```rust\n-pub async fn handle_web_action(\n- State(state): State,\n- headers: HeaderMap,\n- Form(form_data): Form>, // Captures everything dynamically\n-) -> impl IntoResponse {\n- // 1. Authenticate using Bearer / Cookie exactly like the CLI\n- let principal = match extract_web_session(&headers, &state) {\n- Ok(p) => p,\n- Err(_) => return DomPatch::new().eval(\"window.location = '/auth/login';\").into_response(),\n- };\n-\n- // 2. Decode the Base64 JSON\n- let b64 = form_data.get(\"__rpc__\").expect(\"Missing RPC payload in form\");\n- let decoded = base64::decode(b64).expect(\"Bad b64\");\n- let mut json_ast: Value = serde_json::from_slice(&decoded).expect(\"Bad JSON\");\n-\n- // 3. Do AST Substitution!\n- substitute_form_vars(&mut json_ast, &form_data);\n-\n- // 4. Parse it strongly into the RPC enum\n- let command: RpcCommand = serde_json::from_value(json_ast).expect(\"Invalid RpcCommand\");\n-\n- // 5. Pass it to the core execute function (authz + mutation happens here)\n- match execute_rpc(&state.reduced.read().await, &principal, command).await {\n- Ok(RpcResponse::IngestOk { new_ranks }) => {\n- // Translate the RpcResponse to UI JS snippets\n- DomPatch::new()\n- .morph(\"#rank-container\", &render_ranking(&new_ranks))\n- .eval(\"document.getElementById('ingest-form').reset();\")\n- .into_response()\n- }\n- Ok(_) => DomPatch::new().eval(\"console.log('Action complete');\").into_response(),\n- Err(e) => {\n- // Reconcile errors\n- DomPatch::new()\n- .morph(\"#error-banner\", &format!(\"
{}
\", e.message()))\n- .into_response()\n- }\n- }\n-}\n-```\n-\n-### The Verdict on the Grand Architecture\n-\n-By combining:\n-1. The **Domain-Driven Asymmetry** (Spaces contain Gardens & Threads)\n-2. The **Core RPC Logic** (1 executor, `Vec`, strict ACL checks)\n-3. The **Single Web Form Controller** (b64 embedded, `substitute_form_vars()`)\n-4. The **Javascript DomPatch Builder**\n-\n-You have constructed an application architecture that gives you absolute security and data integrity for your CLI AI Agents, while keeping the absolute peak hackability, form simplicity, and lightning-fast JS UI diffing of your `evaleval` Python framework. \n-\n-I'm sold. It is clean, it is uniquely fitted to the mechanics of Rust (`serde`, `enums`), and it solves the URL routing fatigue problem beautifully. This is the exact way to build `slug.social` v2.\n\\ No newline at end of file\n","role":"user"}],"model":"openai/gpt-chat-latest"}