c_5e6847233bd602cb8f

Commit A makes multiple user-facing and architectural improvements across the application: it fixes vote page behavior, changes delegate handling by passing the browser agent out-of-band, removes an incorrect fallback when too few sibling items exist, simplifies the UI by removing the swap button, renames routes from /vote/compare to /vote, updates tests, and threads the API change through the codebase. These changes affect functionality, routing, correctness, and maintenance. Commit B only deletes a developer notes file with no direct effect on application behavior or infrastructure. As a result, A contributes substantially more.

Side A makes substantive functional changes across multiple modules: fixes vote flow logic, removes incorrect fallback behavior, updates routing, adjusts UI behavior, and modifies API parameters with real impact on correctness and UX. Side B only deletes a notes file with no runtime effect. The impact difference is large.

Side A makes substantial functional changes across many files: API signature updates, UI behavior fixes, route renaming with corresponding router and test updates, removal of fallback logic, and UI element removal. It meaningfully alters application behavior and structure. Side B only deletes a single notes file with no impact on runtime functionality.

Commit A only deletes a developer notes/TODO file and does not change project functionality or infrastructure. Commit B performs a substantial repository reorganization: it adds GitHub Actions CI and deployment workflows, introduces workspace and server crate structure, adds build and configuration files, creates a new application scaffold with routing, state, event log, UI, tests, static assets, ignores, and project organization while moving legacy code aside and updating deployment configuration. Despite including many moved/generated files, it represents a major structural contribution compared with a simple cleanup.

Side A makes substantive functional fixes: correct out-of-band delegate attribution, real bugfix replacing a silent fallback with an explicit error when the sibling pool is too small, removal of a broken/pointless UI feature, and a route rename applied consistently across code and tests. Side B merely deletes a scratch notes file, which is trivial housekeeping with no functional impact on the project.

Commit A delivers real product fixes: correct out-of-band delegate attribution, stopping a bad fallback when the sibling pool is too small, removing a useless control, and a route rename with matching call sites/tests. Commit B only deletes a scratch notes.tdsl file and adds no lasting design or behavior.

Side A makes multiple functional improvements: it correctly passes delegate attribution out-of-band instead of embedding it in DSL text, fixes vote-pair selection by returning no next pair rather than incorrectly falling back to all items when the sibling pool is too small, simplifies the UI by removing the swap button, and consistently renames the public voting route from /vote/compare to /vote across code and tests. Side B only deletes a developer notes file, removing project documentation without adding runtime behavior or architectural value.

Side A makes functional improvements: it fixes vote pair selection by returning None instead of incorrectly falling back to all items, properly threads delegate_opt through RPC calls, and updates routes and UI behavior (e.g., removing the swap button and renaming /vote/compare to /vote). Side B only deletes a notes file with no impact on runtime behavior.

Side A makes substantive behavioral changes: it correctly passes `delegate_opt` out-of-band instead of embedding `WEB_BROWSER_AGENT` in the DSL text, prevents incorrect fallback to all items when the sibling pool is < 2 (returning `None` instead), removes the ineffective "swap sides" UI, and renames `/vote/compare` to `/vote` with routing and test updates. Side B only deletes a `notes.tdsl` file containing informal TODO notes, with no impact on runtime behavior.

Commit B is a substantial, working scaffold for a new Rust/Axum service (sorter2) with CI/deploy workflows, a real Cargo workspace, ranking/reducer/event-log modules, tests, and a functioning demo UI wired end-to-end—clear lasting infrastructure. Commit A merely deletes a personal scratch notes file (notes.tdsl) with no functional impact on the codebase.

Commit A only deletes a scratch notes.tdsl file of personal TODOs—a trivial cleanup with no design or product impact. Commit B is a full project reshuffle: renames the app to sorter2, introduces a proper Cargo workspace and server crate, adds CI/deploy workflows, .dockerignore/.gitignore, a minimal working axum scaffold with tests, moves old slug code into legacy/, and updates Dockerfile/fly.toml for the new deploy target—lasting structural value far beyond A.

Side B introduces lasting project infrastructure: GitHub Actions CI and deployment workflows, workspace/Cargo configuration, a new `server` crate scaffold, static assets, integration tests, and repository hygiene files like `.gitignore` and `.dockerignore`. Although much of the diff is generated (`Cargo.lock`) or code relocation into `legacy/`, it still adds durable build and deployment capability, whereas Side A only deletes a developer notes file with no functional impact.