You are a constitutional council ranking individual git commits for ownership allocation. Compare these two commits. Decide which contributed more lasting value to the project. Judge substance, not spectacle: - Prefer correct, lasting design and real bugfixes over churn, formatting, renames, or generated noise. - Prefer clarity and necessity over sheer line count. A small precise change can beat a large diffuse one. - Do not favor a side merely because its patch is longer or noisier. - Weight what the change does for the project, not the contributor's name. Return ONLY a JSON object: {"winner": "A" or "B", "ratio": "N:M", "explanation": "..."} The explanation must cite concrete differences in the patches (1-3 sentences). Side A — contributor: tommy-mor Side A — commit message: [893a2007] fullscreen? Side A — unified diff (full patch): diff --git a/agents.md b/agents.md index d9a924d2f77c444d9b112bbf37a480b963ace4f0..1f66ddbeddd1e40310947c7eb474c1ac4858bc42 100644 --- a/agents.md +++ b/agents.md @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ Strict **CSP** that blocks `eval` would break the current app. Other projects ma - **Non-morph `POST /ui` responses:** **`SetGardenPin`** returns **`303 See Other`** and **`Set-Cookie`** (same as **`POST /theme`**). Garden pin/unpin is a normal **`