You are a constitutional council ranking individual git commits for ownership allocation.

Compare these two commits. Decide which contributed more lasting value to the project.

Judge substance, not spectacle:
- Prefer correct, lasting design and real bugfixes over churn, formatting, renames, or generated noise.
- Prefer clarity and necessity over sheer line count. A small precise change can beat a large diffuse one.
- Do not favor a side merely because its patch is longer or noisier.
- Weight what the change does for the project, not the contributor's name.

Return ONLY a JSON object: {"winner": "A" or "B", "ratio": "N:M", "explanation": "..."}
The explanation must cite concrete differences in the patches (1-3 sentences).

Side A — contributor: tommy-mor
Side A — commit message:
[5db58b98] Improve vote pair selection for spanning trees and rank refinement.

Prefer attaching unranked items to established components before comparing
isolates, then zip down adjacent rank-centrality pairs once the pool is fully
connected, skipping pairs that already have votes.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

Side A — unified diff (full patch):
diff --git a/server/src/pair.rs b/server/src/pair.rs
index 54b5d2417e9dba04ed8df422156e274c2b2f76b2..c14de4b0502c8b5a17cddf3746077739d56e03e0 100644
--- a/server/src/pair.rs
+++ b/server/src/pair.rs
@@ -3,13 +3,21 @@
 //! Pair selection prefers **bridge** votes — comparisons between items in
 //! different connected components of the voted-pairs graph — so the pool
 //! merges into one ranking group before refining within it.
+//!
+//! Among unvoted bridges, prefer merging established voted components, then
+//! attaching a never-voted child to an established component, and only then
+//! comparing two never-voted children (so the voted graph grows as one tree).
+//!
+//! Once every pool child sits in one voted component, refinement **zips** down
+//! the rank-centrality order: prefer 1 vs 2, then 2 vs 3, and so on, skipping
+//! pairs that already have a vote.
 
 use rand::seq::SliceRandom;
 use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
 
 use crate::{
     path_types::ItemId,
-    ranking::connected_components_from_voted_pairs,
+    ranking::{connected_components_from_voted_pairs, ranked_items},
     reducer::{GlobalTree, GroupState},
 };
 
@@ -28,36 +36,77 @@ fn pair_is_voted(group: &GroupState, a: &ItemId, b: &ItemId) -> bool {
     group.voted_pairs.contains(&(i, j))
 }
 
-/// Component id per pool item: voted-pairs graph components plus one id per
-/// never-voted child.
-fn component_ids(group: &GroupState, pool: &[ItemId]) -> HashMap<ItemId, usize> {
+/// Voted-pairs layout for pool items: component id per item plus which ids are
+/// multi-node voted components (ranked groups in the UI).
+struct ComponentLayout {
+    ids: HashMap<ItemId, usize>,
+    established: HashSet<usize>,
+}
+
+fn component_layout(group: &GroupState, pool: &[ItemId]) -> ComponentLayout {
     let n = group.idx_to_item.len();
     let (comps, isolates) =
         connected_components_from_voted_pairs(n, group.voted_pairs.iter().copied());
 
-    let mut out: HashMap<ItemId, usize> = HashMap::new();
+    let mut established = HashSet::new();
+    let mut ids: HashMap<ItemId, usize> = HashMap::new();
     for (comp_idx, comp) in comps.iter().enumerate() {
+        if comp.len() >= 2 {
+            established.insert(comp_idx);
+        }
         for &idx in comp {
             if idx < n {
-                out.insert(group.idx_to_item[idx].clone(), comp_idx);
+                ids.insert(group.idx_to_item[idx].clone(), comp_idx);
             }
         }
     }
     let mut next = comps.len();
     for &idx in &isolates {
         if idx < n {
-            out.insert(group.idx_to_item[idx].clone(), next);
+            ids.insert(group.idx_to_item[idx].clone(), next);
             next += 1;
         }
     }
     for item in pool {
-        out.entry(item.clone()).or_insert_with(|| {
+        ids.entry(item.clone()).or_insert_with(|| {
             let id = next;
             next += 1;
             id
         });
     }
-    out
+    ComponentLayout { ids, established }
+}
+
+/// Every pool child shares one multi-node voted component (spanning tree phase done).
+fn pool_fully_connected(layout: &ComponentLayout, pool: &[ItemId]) -> bool {
+    if pool.len() < 2 {
+        return false;
+    }
+    let mut comp_id = None;
+    for item in pool {
+        let Some(id) = layout.ids.get(item) else {
+            return false;
+        };
+        if !layout.established.contains(id) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        match comp_id {
+            None => comp_id = Some(*id),
+            Some(expected) if expected == *id => {}
+            _ => return false,
+        }
+    }
+    comp_id.is_some()
+}
+
+/// Pool children that appear in `group`, sorted best rank first.
+fn ranked_pool_order(group: &GroupState, pool: &[ItemId]) -> Vec<ItemId> {
+    let pool_set: HashSet<_> = pool.iter().collect();
+    ranked_items(group)
+        .into_iter()
+        .map(|r| r.item)
+        .filter(|id| pool_set.contains(id))
+        .collect()
 }
 
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
@@ -72,19 +121,108 @@ enum PairPriority {
     WithinVoted = 3,
 }
 
-fn pair_priority(
+/// Tie-break among unvoted bridge pairs.
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
+enum BridgeSubPriority {
+    /// Both endpoints lie in established (multi-node) voted components.
+    MergeEstablished = 0,
+    /// One established component member and one never-voted child.
+    AttachIsolate = 1,
+    /// Two never-voted children (separate singleton components).
+    IsolatePair = 2,
+}
+
+/// Tie-break among within-component pairs once the pool is one connected group.
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
+struct WithinSubPriority {
+    /// 1 = adjacent ranks (i vs i+1); larger = farther apart in the order.
+    rank_gap: usize,
+    /// min rank index of the two — zip from the top (1 vs 2 before 2 vs 3).
+    zip_index: usize,
+}
+
+const WITHIN_SUB_WORST: WithinSubPriority = WithinSubPriority {
+    rank_gap: usize::MAX,
+    zip_index: usize::MAX,
+};
+
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
+struct PairSortKey {
+    priority: PairPriority,
+    bridge_sub: BridgeSubPriority,
+    within_sub: WithinSubPriority,
+}
+
+fn item_in_established(layout: &ComponentLayout, item: &ItemId) -> bool {
+    layout
+        .ids
+        .get(item)
+        .is_some_and(|id| layout.established.contains(id))
+}
+
+fn bridge_sub_priority(layout: &ComponentLayout, a: &ItemId, b: &ItemId) -> BridgeSubPriority {
+    let a_est = item_in_established(layout, a);
+    let b_est = item_in_established(layout, b);
+    match (a_est, b_est) {
+        (true, true) => BridgeSubPriority::MergeEstablished,
+        (true, false) | (false, true) => BridgeSubPriority::AttachIsolate,
+        (false, false) => BridgeSubPriority::IsolatePair,
+    }
+}
+
+fn within_sub_priority(
+    group: &GroupState,
+    pool: &[ItemId],
+    layout: &ComponentLayout,
+    a: &ItemId,
+    b: &ItemId,
+) -> WithinSubPriority {
+    if !pool_fully_connected(layout, pool) {
+        return WITHIN_SUB_WORST;
+    }
+    let order = ranked_pool_order(group, pool);
+    let (Some(i), Some(j)) = (order.iter().position(|x| x == a), order.iter().position(|x| x == b))
+    else {
+        return WITHIN_SUB_WORST;
+    };
+    WithinSubPriority {
+        rank_gap: i.abs_diff(j),
+        zip_index: i.min(j),
+    }
+}
+
+fn pair_sort_key(
     group: &GroupState,
-    components: &HashMap<ItemId, usize>,
+    pool: &[ItemId],
+    layout: &ComponentLayout,
     a: &ItemId,
     b: &ItemId,
-) -> PairPriority {
+) -> PairSortKey {
     let voted = pair_is_voted(group, a, b);
-    let bridge = components.get(a) != components.get(b);
-    match (bridge, voted) {
+    let bridge = layout.ids.get(a) != layout.ids.get(b);
+    let priority = match (bridge, voted) {
         (true, false) => PairPriority::BridgeUnvoted,
         (false, false) => PairPriority::WithinUnvoted,
         (true, true) => PairPriority::BridgeVoted,
         (false, true) => PairPriority::WithinVoted,
+    };
+    let bridge_sub = if priority == PairPriority::BridgeUnvoted {
+        bridge_sub_priority(layout, a, b)
+    } else {
+        BridgeSubPriority::MergeEstablished
+    };
+    let within_sub = if matches!(
+        priority,
+        PairPriority::WithinUnvoted | PairPriority::WithinVoted
+    ) {
+        within_sub_priority(group, pool, layout, a, b)
+    } else {
+        WITHIN_SUB_WORST
+    };
+    PairSortKey {
+        priority,
+        bridge_sub,
+        within_sub,
     }
 }
 
@@ -109,9 +247,12 @@ fn candidate_pairs(pool: &[ItemId], exclude: Option<(&ItemId, &ItemId)>) -> Vec<
 
 /// Pick the next pair to vote on within `pool`.
 ///
-/// 1. Prefer unvoted **bridge** pairs (connect separate ranking components).
-/// 2. Then unvoted within-component pairs (refinement).
-/// 3. Then already-voted pairs (re-compare).
+/// 1. Prefer unvoted **bridge** pairs (connect separate ranking components),
+///    with sub-priority: merge established components, attach an isolate to
+///    established, then compare two isolates.
+/// 2. Then unvoted within-component pairs; when the pool is one connected group,
+///    prefer adjacent ranks (1 vs 2, 2 vs 3, …) in order, skipping voted pairs.
+/// 3. Then already-voted pairs (re-compare), with the same zip ordering.
 pub fn suggest_next_pair_in_pool(
     group: &GroupState,
     pool: &[ItemId],
@@ -121,15 +262,15 @@ pub fn suggest_next_pair_in_pool(
     if candidates.is_empty() {
         return None;
     }
-    let components = component_ids(group, pool);
+    let layout = component_layout(group, pool);
     let best = candidates
         .iter()
-        .map(|(a, b)| (pair_priority(group, &components, a, b), (a, b)))
-        .min_by_key(|(p, _)| *p)?
+        .map(|(a, b)| (pair_sort_key(group, pool, &layout, a, b), (a, b)))
+        .min_by_key(|(k, _)| *k)?
         .0;
     let best_pairs: Vec<(ItemId, ItemId)> = candidates
         .into_iter()
-        .filter(|(a, b)| pair_priority(group, &components, a, b) == best)
+        .filter(|(a, b)| pair_sort_key(group, pool, &layout, a, b) == best)
         .collect();
     best_pairs.choose(&mut rand::thread_rng()).cloned()
 }
@@ -303,6 +444,38 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(from_ab && from_cd, "expected bridge pair, got {:?}", chosen);
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn suggest_prefers_attach_over_isolate_pair_among_many_unranked() {
+        let parent = ItemId::parse("reddit.com/r/rust").unwrap();
+        let mut tree = seed_children(
+            &parent,
+            &[
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/a",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/b",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/c",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/d",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/e",
+            ],
+        );
+        let ab =
+            VoteData::from_recorded(1, "reddit.com/r/rust/a", "reddit.com/r/rust/b", 2, 1).unwrap();
+        tree.apply_vote(&parent, ab);
+        let group = tree.get(&parent).unwrap().local_ranking.clone();
+        let pool = children_of(&tree, &parent);
+        let pair = suggest_next_pair_in_pool(&group, &pool, None).unwrap();
+        let chosen = pair_set(&pair);
+        let from_ab =
+            chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/a") || chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/b");
+        let from_cde = chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/c")
+            || chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/d")
+            || chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/e");
+        assert!(
+            from_ab && from_cde,
+            "expected ranked+unranked attach, got {:?}",
+            chosen
+        );
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn suggest_connects_isolate_to_existing_component() {
         let parent = ItemId::parse("reddit.com/r/rust").unwrap();
@@ -325,6 +498,65 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/a") || chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/b"));
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn suggest_zips_adjacent_ranks_when_tree_complete() {
+        let parent = ItemId::parse("reddit.com/r/rust").unwrap();
+        let mut tree = seed_children(
+            &parent,
+            &[
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/a",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/b",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/c",
+            ],
+        );
+        // Star at a connects all three; b-c is the only unvoted adjacent pair left.
+        for (a, b, l, r) in [
+            ("reddit.com/r/rust/a", "reddit.com/r/rust/b", 3, 1),
+            ("reddit.com/r/rust/a", "reddit.com/r/rust/c", 2, 1),
+        ] {
+            let v = VoteData::from_recorded(1, a, b, l, r).unwrap();
+            tree.apply_vote(&parent, v);
+        }
+        let group = tree.get(&parent).unwrap().local_ranking.clone();
+        let pool = children_of(&tree, &parent);
+        let pair = suggest_next_pair_in_pool(&group, &pool, None).unwrap();
+        let chosen = pair_set(&pair);
+        // a-b and a-c voted; b-c is the only unvoted adjacent pair in rank order.
+        assert!(chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/b"));
+        assert!(chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/c"));
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn suggest_zip_prefers_1v2_before_2v3_when_both_unvoted() {
+        let parent = ItemId::parse("reddit.com/r/rust").unwrap();
+        let mut tree = seed_children(
+            &parent,
+            &[
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/a",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/b",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/c",
+                "reddit.com/r/rust/d",
+            ],
+        );
+        // Hub at c connects all four; leave rank-adjacent a-b and b-c unvoted.
+        for (a, b, l, r) in [
+            ("reddit.com/r/rust/c", "reddit.com/r/rust/d", 3, 1),
+            ("reddit.com/r/rust/b", "reddit.com/r/rust/c", 2, 1),
+            ("reddit.com/r/rust/a", "reddit.com/r/rust/c", 2, 1),
+        ] {
+            let v = VoteData::from_recorded(1, a, b, l, r).unwrap();
+            tree.apply_vote(&parent, v);
+        }
+        let group = tree.get(&parent).unwrap().local_ranking.clone();
+        let pool = children_of(&tree, &parent);
+        assert!(pool_fully_connected(&component_layout(&group, &pool), &pool));
+        let pair = suggest_next_pair_in_pool(&group, &pool, None).unwrap();
+        let chosen = pair_set(&pair);
+        // Top adjacent unvoted edge should be a-b (zip index 0), not b-c (index 1).
+        assert!(chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/a"));
+        assert!(chosen.contains("reddit.com/r/rust/b"));
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn resolve_pair_picks_from_pool() {
         let parent = ItemId::parse("reddit.com/r/rust").unwrap();


Side B — contributor: tommy-mor
Side B — commit message:
[aa0b175c] Enforce vote ratio constraints: both sides ≥ 1, max 100.

Zero on either side produces no valid graph edge; ratios above 100
add no meaningful signal. Enforce in the DSL parser, browser POST
handler, and reducer guard. Update browser pool test to use 99:1
instead of 100:0. Add unit and integration regression tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Side B — unified diff (full patch):
diff --git a/server/src/api/ui_html.rs b/server/src/api/ui_html.rs
index b79efdb4d52bd445a67f38cbfd61d3507d2b3014..bc8a0130b434cc7880a4bf16eb9237080c4aa383 100644
--- a/server/src/api/ui_html.rs
+++ b/server/src/api/ui_html.rs
@@ -243,11 +243,23 @@ async fn dispatch_ui_action(
             let pool_id = pool.as_deref().and_then(|p| {
                 crate::path_types::ItemId::parse(p.trim()).map(|i| i.normalized_storage())
             });
-            let mut rl = ratio_left.trim().parse::<i32>().unwrap_or(0).max(0);
-            let mut rr = ratio_right.trim().parse::<i32>().unwrap_or(0).max(0);
-            if rl == 0 && rr == 0 {
-                rl = 1;
-                rr = 1;
+            let rl = ratio_left.trim().parse::<i32>().unwrap_or(0).max(0);
+            let rr = ratio_right.trim().parse::<i32>().unwrap_or(0).max(0);
+            if rl == 0 || rr == 0 {
+                return form_js_error(
+                    err_tgt.as_ref(),
+                    "invalid ratio",
+                    "Both ratio sides must be ≥ 1.",
+                )
+                .into_response();
+            }
+            if rl > 100 || rr > 100 {
+                return form_js_error(
+                    err_tgt.as_ref(),
+                    "invalid ratio",
+                    "Ratio sides must be ≤ 100.",
+                )
+                .into_response();
             }
 
             let text = format!(
diff --git a/server/src/dsl.rs b/server/src/dsl.rs
index faa8aac6616bc6ea2b102d08ae999c01a716ef6e..338feacc579a92bed291867cc0f2f62462737462 100644
--- a/server/src/dsl.rs
+++ b/server/src/dsl.rs
@@ -545,9 +545,14 @@ fn parse_block_prefixed_statement(
 
     let ((ratio_left, ratio_right), k) = parse_comparison_at(s, i)
         .ok_or_else(|| DslError::Parse(format!("invalid comparison near: {}", &s[i..])))?;
-    if ratio_left == 0 && ratio_right == 0 {
+    if ratio_left == 0 || ratio_right == 0 {
         return Err(DslError::Parse(
-            "vote ratio 0:0 is invalid; use 1:1 for a tie or omit the vote".to_string(),
+            "vote ratio sides must be ≥ 1; use 1:1 for a tie or omit the vote".to_string(),
+        ));
+    }
+    if ratio_left > 100 || ratio_right > 100 {
+        return Err(DslError::Parse(
+            "vote ratio sides must be ≤ 100".to_string(),
         ));
     }
     i = skip_ws(s, k);
@@ -929,11 +934,50 @@ mod tests {
         let err = parse_full("{tie placeholder}\n~/a 0:0 ~/b").unwrap_err();
         let DslError::Parse(msg) = err;
         assert!(
-            msg.contains("0:0"),
-            "expected 0:0 rejection message, got: {msg}"
+            msg.contains("≥ 1"),
+            "expected zero-side rejection message, got: {msg}"
         );
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn parse_vote_rejects_left_zero_ratio() {
+        let err = parse_full("{prefer b}\n~/a 0:5 ~/b").unwrap_err();
+        let DslError::Parse(msg) = err;
+        assert!(
+            msg.contains("≥ 1"),
+            "expected zero-side rejection message, got: {msg}"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn parse_vote_rejects_right_zero_ratio() {
+        let err = parse_full("{prefer a}\n~/a 5:0 ~/b").unwrap_err();
+        let DslError::Parse(msg) = err;
+        assert!(
+            msg.contains("≥ 1"),
+            "expected zero-side rejection message, got: {msg}"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn parse_vote_rejects_over_max_ratio() {
+        let err = parse_full("{prefer a strongly}\n~/a 101:1 ~/b").unwrap_err();
+        let DslError::Parse(msg) = err;
+        assert!(
+            msg.contains("≤ 100"),
+            "expected max ratio rejection message, got: {msg}"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn parse_vote_accepts_max_ratio() {
+        let doc = parse_full("{prefer a}\n~/a 100:1 ~/b").unwrap();
+        assert!(matches!(
+            doc.statements.last(),
+            Some(Stmt::Vote { ratio_left: 100, ratio_right: 1, .. })
+        ));
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn parse_full_interleaves_prose() {
         let input = "hello\n#tag\nworld";
diff --git a/server/src/reducer.rs b/server/src/reducer.rs
index e949e8e092297eedd5c20c131f16ef0121f329b3..6841d35cfc9de2389f340a22b8a45acb335e36c3 100644
--- a/server/src/reducer.rs
+++ b/server/src/reducer.rs
@@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ impl GroupState {
         let (i, j) = if a_idx < b_idx { (a_idx, b_idx) } else { (b_idx, a_idx) };
         self.voted_pairs.insert((i, j));
 
-        let mut w_a = vote.ratio_left.max(0) as f64;
-        let mut w_b = vote.ratio_right.max(0) as f64;
-        if w_a == 0.0 && w_b == 0.0 {
-            w_a = 1.0;
-            w_b = 1.0;
+        let w_a = vote.ratio_left as f64;
+        let w_b = vote.ratio_right as f64;
+        if w_a == 0.0 || w_b == 0.0 {
+            // Zero on either side produces no valid edge; drop the vote.
+            return;
         }
 
         self.add_edge_weight(b_idx, a_idx, w_a);
diff --git a/server/tests/basic.rs b/server/tests/basic.rs
index 9d83e7a97e2c7494790db17c4b5b30c181705026..cc8c1a0d139f3722ba6ecd13dd001c65be835b67 100644
--- a/server/tests/basic.rs
+++ b/server/tests/basic.rs
@@ -175,14 +175,14 @@ fn reducer_clamps_score_bounds() {
     let mut state = ReducerState::default();
     state.apply_event(ingest_event(
         1,
-        "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n~/t/a {a}\n~/t/b {b}\n{huge}\n~/t/a 1000:1 ~/t/b\n",
+        "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n~/t/a {a}\n~/t/b {b}\n{huge}\n~/t/a 100:1 ~/t/b\n",
     ));
     state.apply_event(ingest_event(
         2,
-        "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n{huge}\n~/t/a 1:1000 ~/t/b\n",
+        "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n{huge}\n~/t/a 1:100 ~/t/b\n",
     ));
 
-    assert_eq!(state.public().ranking_group.idx_to_item.len(), 2); // Should still work, scores clamped internally
+    assert_eq!(state.public().ranking_group.idx_to_item.len(), 2); // Should still work, scores handled internally
 }
 
 // ============================================================================
@@ -513,8 +513,8 @@ fn dsl_parse_rejects_zero_zero_vote_ratio() {
     .expect_err("0:0 vote must be rejected by the parser");
     let slugsocial_server::dsl::DslError::Parse(msg) = err;
     assert!(
-        msg.contains("0:0"),
-        "expected message about invalid 0:0 ratio, got: {msg}"
+        msg.contains("≥ 1"),
+        "expected message about invalid zero ratio, got: {msg}"
     );
 
     let mut state = ReducerState::default();
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ fn dsl_parse_rejects_zero_zero_vote_ratio() {
 #[test]
 fn reducer_negative_ratio_clamped_to_zero() {
     let _state = ReducerState::default();
-    // GroupState::apply_vote clamps negatives to 0, then 0:0 -> 1:1
+    // GroupState::apply_vote clamps negatives to 0; when either side is 0 the vote is dropped.
     let mut group = GroupState::new();
     group.apply_vote(slugsocial_server::reducer::VoteData {
         ts: 1,
@@ -546,12 +546,12 @@ fn reducer_negative_ratio_clamped_to_zero() {
         delegate: Some("00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test".to_string()),
         thread_tag: "t".to_string(),
     });
+    // Items are registered, but the zero-clamped vote produces no edges.
     assert_eq!(group.idx_to_item.len(), 2);
-    // Both edges should exist (negatives clamped to 0, then 0:0 -> 1:1)
     let a_idx = group.item_to_idx[&item_id("https://slug.social/~/t/a")];
     let b_idx = group.item_to_idx[&item_id("https://slug.social/~/t/b")];
-    assert!(group.edges.contains_key(&(a_idx, b_idx)));
-    assert!(group.edges.contains_key(&(b_idx, a_idx)));
+    assert!(!group.edges.contains_key(&(a_idx, b_idx)));
+    assert!(!group.edges.contains_key(&(b_idx, a_idx)));
 }
 
 
diff --git a/server/tests/integration_ui.rs b/server/tests/integration_ui.rs
index 23db7b5672418d5bb0ab7529e05ef1f89e59062a..09c5481f039d59efb617a82bafcc432a186e2d30 100644
--- a/server/tests/integration_ui.rs
+++ b/server/tests/integration_ui.rs
@@ -256,3 +256,96 @@ async fn test_sse_public_thread_morph_includes_post_body_not_thread_not_found()
     );
 }
 
+fn ui_vote_compare_post_rpc(
+    room: &str,
+    thread_tag: &str,
+    left: &str,
+    right: &str,
+    ratio_left: &str,
+    ratio_right: &str,
+    explanation: &str,
+) -> String {
+    serde_json::json!({
+        "action": "vote_compare_post",
+        "room": room,
+        "thread_tag": thread_tag,
+        "left_item": left,
+        "right_item": right,
+        "ratio_left": ratio_left,
+        "ratio_right": ratio_right,
+        "explanation": explanation,
+        "next": "/vote",
+    })
+    .to_string()
+}
+
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_vote_compare_post_rejects_zero_left_ratio() {
+    let (addr, _tmp, _log, _handle) = create_test_server().await;
+    let client = reqwest::Client::new();
+    let bearer = test_bearer();
+
+    let rpc = ui_vote_compare_post_rpc("public", "test-vote", "~/a", "~/b", "0", "5", "prefer b");
+    let resp = client
+        .post(format!("http://{addr}/ui"))
+        .header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {bearer}"))
+        .form(&[("__rpc__", rpc.as_str())])
+        .send()
+        .await
+        .unwrap();
+
+    assert_eq!(resp.status(), reqwest::StatusCode::OK);
+    let js = resp.text().await.unwrap();
+    assert!(
+        js.contains("invalid ratio") || js.contains("≥ 1"),
+        "expected zero-ratio rejection, got: {js}"
+    );
+}
+
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_vote_compare_post_rejects_zero_right_ratio() {
+    let (addr, _tmp, _log, _handle) = create_test_server().await;
+    let client = reqwest::Client::new();
+    let bearer = test_bearer();
+
+    let rpc = ui_vote_compare_post_rpc("public", "test-vote", "~/a", "~/b", "5", "0", "prefer a");
+    let resp = client
+        .post(format!("http://{addr}/ui"))
+        .header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {bearer}"))
+        .form(&[("__rpc__", rpc.as_str())])
+        .send()
+        .await
+        .unwrap();
+
+    assert_eq!(resp.status(), reqwest::StatusCode::OK);
+    let js = resp.text().await.unwrap();
+    assert!(
+        js.contains("invalid ratio") || js.contains("≥ 1"),
+        "expected zero-ratio rejection, got: {js}"
+    );
+}
+
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_vote_compare_post_rejects_over_max_ratio() {
+    let (addr, _tmp, _log, _handle) = create_test_server().await;
+    let client = reqwest::Client::new();
+    let bearer = test_bearer();
+
+    let rpc =
+        ui_vote_compare_post_rpc("public", "test-vote", "~/a", "~/b", "101", "1", "prefer a");
+    let resp = client
+        .post(format!("http://{addr}/ui"))
+        .header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {bearer}"))
+        .form(&[("__rpc__", rpc.as_str())])
+        .send()
+        .await
+        .unwrap();
+
+    assert_eq!(resp.status(), reqwest::StatusCode::OK);
+    let js = resp.text().await.unwrap();
+    assert!(
+        js.contains("invalid ratio") || js.contains("≤ 100"),
+        "expected over-max ratio rejection, got: {js}"
+    );
+}
+
diff --git a/test/browser_vote_pool.clj b/test/browser_vote_pool.clj
index 23d0bd80b02bd8b1b48853454bed02793296550e..738608801027d1e662660b5d6c830b4ccd07c434 100644
--- a/test/browser_vote_pool.clj
+++ b/test/browser_vote_pool.clj
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@
 ;; Set the hidden ratio inputs so the alphabetically-earlier item wins.
 (defn- set-ratio! [pg left-text right-text]
   (let [[rl rr] (if (neg? (compare (leaf left-text) (leaf right-text)))
-                  [100 0]   ; left is earlier → prefer left
-                  [0 100])] ; right is earlier → prefer right
+                  [99 1]   ; left is earlier → prefer left
+                  [1 99])] ; right is earlier → prefer right
     (page/evaluate pg (str "document.getElementById('vote-ratio-left').value='" rl "'"))
     (page/evaluate pg (str "document.getElementById('vote-ratio-right').value='" rr "'"))))