You are a constitutional council ranking individual git commits for ownership allocation. Compare these two commits. Decide which contributed more lasting value to the project. Judge substance, not spectacle: - Prefer correct, lasting design and real bugfixes over churn, formatting, renames, or generated noise. - Prefer clarity and necessity over sheer line count. A small precise change can beat a large diffuse one. - Do not favor a side merely because its patch is longer or noisier. - Weight what the change does for the project, not the contributor's name. Return ONLY a JSON object: {"winner": "A" or "B", "ratio": "N:M", "explanation": "..."} The explanation must cite concrete differences in the patches (1-3 sentences). Side A — contributor: tommy-mor Side A — commit message: [88d81828] idea Side A — unified diff (full patch): diff --git a/seed.tdsl b/seed.tdsl index 499a615041e3be5987dcb306ede84f4ce936e0be..0b707179f09781c53d6526cffeb9158579698ad7 100644 --- a/seed.tdsl +++ b/seed.tdsl @@ -19,3 +19,5 @@ use websocket based bar i had built in afterlife... claude {{ What I'd push on hardest: what's the artifact that gets shared? Letterboxd works because every movie has a beautiful URL, every user has a beautiful profile, every list is screenshot-worthy. AITA-but-ranked needs the same. "This person ranks 97th percentile of asshole, beating 4,891 other Reddit posters this month" — presented well, that's a tweet, that's a screenshot, that's how the next thousand users find you. Build the share artifact early. Streaks and progressive revelation are for retention; the share-out is for acquisition; you need both but the acquisition piece is what makes streaks worth designing. }} + +have index be sorted by viewcount. \ No newline at end of file Side B — contributor: tommy-mor Side B — commit message: [893a2007] fullscreen? Side B — unified diff (full patch): diff --git a/agents.md b/agents.md index d9a924d2f77c444d9b112bbf37a480b963ace4f0..1f66ddbeddd1e40310947c7eb474c1ac4858bc42 100644 --- a/agents.md +++ b/agents.md @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ Strict **CSP** that blocks `eval` would break the current app. Other projects ma - **Non-morph `POST /ui` responses:** **`SetGardenPin`** returns **`303 See Other`** and **`Set-Cookie`** (same as **`POST /theme`**). Garden pin/unpin is a normal **`
`** — browser navigation applies cookies reliably (see **`test/browser_garden_pin.clj`**). Each **`__rpc__`** payload includes **`form_action: "/ui"`**; **`post_ui_html`** rejects mismatches to bind tokens to the UI endpoint. -- **`VoteComparePost`:** On success returns **`text/javascript`** that **morphs** **`#vote-compare-preview`** (new ingest card) and **`#vote-edge-history-region`** (recomputed edge list). Uses **`RpcResult::PostOk`**’s **`post_id`** / **`post_index`** for the card. **`__rpc__`** carries **`form_action: "/ui"`**; **`thread_tag`** and ratio fields come from the same form as **`$form`** holes. +- **`VoteComparePost`:** On success returns **`text/javascript`** that **morphs** **`#vote-compare-preview`** (new ingest card), **`#vote-edge-history-region`** (recomputed **`