Side A fixes a real, concrete bug (canonical tilde-root path normalization causing inconsistent HashMap keys for top-level items) with clear code changes plus targeted unit/integration/browser tests verifying the fix. Side B is a substantial infrastructure change to the ranking meta-system (per-commit vs per-contributor ranking) which is valuable but is self-referential tooling for the judging process itself rather than product code, and carries more diffuse churn across many call sites for a design change that is reasonable but not clearly 'lasting' in the same bug-fixing sense.
constitution · epochs · watch · epoch 3
comparison
c_b0194743d156 (tommy-mor) vs c_fbeec5c4ad18 (tommy-mor)
download prompt · raw event · cmp_a6affd582db187
council reasoning
A delivers lasting product correctness: unifies tilde ontology root storage (`SLUG_TILDE_ONTOLOGY_ROOT`, `normalized_storage`, `tilde_http_path_to_canonical`), fixes map lookups/parent handling so garden root rankings and legacy `…/~/` keys work, and backs it with unit, integration, and browser regressions. B is a valuable constitutional refinement (pairwise per commit instead of bundled authors, rollup, epoch UI), but it mostly rewires existing ranking plumbing rather than fixing core domain behavior.
Side A fixes a substantive canonical-path bug by unifying ontology root handling (`https://slug.social/~` vs `.../~/`), normalizing storage keys before lookups, introducing shared path conversion helpers, and updating rendering logic so root pages and sibling rankings behave correctly. It also adds extensive unit, integration, and browser regression tests covering these cases, whereas Side B mainly changes the ranking workflow from contributor-level to commit-level with corresponding prompt, evidence, UI, and test updates but does not address a core correctness issue in the project itself.
sides
A — c_b0194743d156 (tommy-mor)
message
[c59951f5] fixed canonical item paths business
diff preview
diff --git a/server/src/html/breadcrumb_path.rs b/server/src/html/breadcrumb_path.rs
index 12ad2c84faf2fbb693015d4552e45b5c54d587b9..c8a3937923161a6ff248bd77e87eff0dc6fe9ab0 100644
--- a/server/src/html/breadcrumb_path.rs
+++ b/server/src/html/breadcrumb_path.rs
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-use crate::path_types::CanonicalItemUrl;
+use crate::path_types::{tilde_http_path_to_canonical, CanonicalItemUrl};
/// Semantic view of an ontology path for rendering and routing decisions.
pub(super) struct OntologyPath {
@@ -11,16 +11,7 @@ impl OntologyPath {
/// Path is the `*path` segment from `/~/*path` (e.g. `topic/a`). Always treat it as under `~/`
/// so it canonicalizes to `https://slug.social/~/…`, not the non-tilde site path.
pub(super) fn from_input(path: &str) -> Self {
- let p = path.trim_start_matches('/');
- let raw = if p.starts_with("http://") || p.starts_with("https://") {
- p.to_string()
- } else if p.is_empty() {
- "~/".to_string()
- } else {
- format!("~/{}", p)
- };
- let canonical = CanonicalItemUrl::parse(&raw)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| CanonicalItemUrl::parse("~/").unwrap());
+ let canonical = tilde_http_path_to_canonical(path);
Self::from_canonical(canonical)
}
@@ -37,7 +28,7 @@ impl OntologyPath {
}
pub(super) fn root() -> Self {
- Self::from_canonical(CanonicalItemUrl::parse("~/").unwrap())
+ Self::from_canonical(CanonicalItemUrl::ontology_root())
}
pub(super) fn is_root(&self) -> bool {
diff --git a/server/src/html/garden.rs b/server/src/html/garden.rs
index d58d9b46f575eb6b7e4971086b07dda75ca2f645..319feb15a6b68d2b5df98b4289fedbc9bdd048d3 100644
--- a/server/src/html/garden.rs
+++ b/server/src/html/garden.rs
@@ -459,6 +459,8 @@ struct ItemPageViewModel {
item: String,
body: Option<String>,
sibling_rank: Option<SiblingRank>,
+ /// False at the tilde ontology root (`~/`): sibling-rank footnote does not apply.
+ item_has_parent: bool,
child_rankings: ChildrenRankings,
rank_history: Vec<RankHistoryEntryView>,
/// Forum threads that mention or vote on this item.
@@ -470,11 +472,12 @@ fn build_sibling_rank(
scope: &ScopeId,
item: &CanonicalItemUrl,
) -> Option<SiblingRank> {
+ let item = item.clone().normalized_storage();
let content = reduced
.content_for_scope(scope)
.unwrap_or_else(|| reduced.public());
let group = &content.ranking_group;
- let parent = item.parent()?;
+ let parent = item.parent()?.normalized_storage();
let siblings: Vec<CanonicalItemUrl> = content
.item_children
.get(&parent)
@@ -492,7 +495,7 @@ fn build_sibling_rank(
if scoped_idxs.is_empty() {
return None;
}
- let current_idx = *group.item_to_idx.get(item)?;
+ let current_idx = *group.item_to_idx.get(&item)?;
if !scoped_idxs.contains(¤t_idx) {
return None;
}
@@ -520,7 +523,7 @@ fn build_sibling_rank(
.filter_map(|li| local_to_global.get(*li).copied())
.collect();
let ranked = ranked_items_subset(group, &comp_global, 10000, 1e-8);
- let position = ranked.iter().position(|r| &r.item == item)? + 1;
+ let position = ranked.iter().position(|r| r.item == item)? + 1;
Some(SiblingRank {
position,
component_size: ranked.len(),
@@ -597,7 +600,9 @@ fn build_item_page_view_model(
.content_for_scope(scope)
.unwrap_or_else(|| reduced.public());
let item_key = CanonicalItemUrl::parse(item)
- .unwrap_or_else(|| CanonicalItemUrl::parse("~/").unwrap());
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| CanonicalItemUrl::parse("~/").unwrap())
+ .normalized_storage();
+ let item_has_parent = item_key.parent().is_some();
let child_rankings = build_children_rankings(content, &item_key);
let rank_history = build_rank_history(reduced, scope, item_key.as_str());
@@ -617,6 +622,7 @@ fn build_item_page_view_model(
.cloned()
.or_else(|| reduced.public().item_bodies.get(&item_key).cloned()),
sibling_rank: build_sibling_rank(reduced, scope, &item_key),
+ item_has_parent,
child_rankings,
rank_history,
threads,
@@ -652,7 +658,7 @@ async fn render_scope_view(
(format!("#{} of {}", rank.position, rank.component_size))
}
span class="muted" { (format!("({} siblings)", rank.sibling_total)) }
- } @else {
+ } @else if model.item_has_parent {
span class="muted" { "unranked among siblings" }
}
}
@@ -815,6 +821,18 @@ mod tests {
}));
}
+ fn apply_ingest_room(state: &mut ReducerState, ts: i64, room_id: &str, raw: &str) {
+ state.apply_event(Event::Ingest(Ingest {
+ ts,
+ id: format!("ing-{ts}"),
+ raw: raw.to_string(),
+ principal: "testuser".to_string(),
+ delegate: Some("00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test".to_string()),
+ room_id: room_id.to_string(),
+ thread_tag: String::new(),
+ }));
+ }
+
#[test]
fn item_page_model_includes_body_and_unranked_without_votes() {
let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
@@ -885,4 +903,85 @@ mod tests {
|| model.child_rankings.unranked_items.contains(&CanonicalItemUrl("https://slug.social/~/topic/kid2".to_string()))
);
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn item_page_room_scope_root_lists_top_level_children() {
+ let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
+ apply_ingest_room(
+ &mut reduced,
+ 1,
+ "9ab12cd/my-room",
+ "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n~/t1 {a}\n~/t2 {b}\n",
+ );
+ use crate::path_types::CanonicalItemUrl;
+ let root = CanonicalItemUrl::ontology_root();
+ let model = build_item_page_view_model(
+ &reduced,
+ &ScopeId::Room("9ab12cd/my-room".to_string()),
+ root.as_str(),
+ );
+ assert!(!model.item_has_parent);
+ assert_eq!(model.child_rankings.unranked_items.len(), 2);
+ let set: std::collections::HashSet<&str> = model
+ .child_rankings
+ .unranked_items
+ .iter()
+ .map(|u| u.as_str())
+ .collect();
+ assert!(set.contains("https://slug.social/~/t1"));
+ assert!(set.contains("https://slug.social/~/t2"));
+ }
+
+ /// Top-level `~/a` vs `~/b` votes form one ranked component under the ontology root.
+ #[test]
+ fn item_page_room_scope_root_shows_ranked_child_group() {
+ let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
+ apply_ingest_room(
+ &mut reduced,
+ 1,
+ "9ab12cd/my-room",
+ "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n\
+ ~/a {a}\n~/b {b}\n~/a 2:1 ~/b {because}\n",
+ );
+ use crate::path_types::CanonicalItemUrl;
+ let root = CanonicalItemUrl::ontology_root();
+ let model = build_item_page_view_model(
+ &reduced,
+ &ScopeId::Room("9ab12cd/my-room".to_string()),
+ root.as_str(),
+ );
+ assert_eq!(model.child_rankings.component_rankings.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(model.child_rankings.component_rankings[0].pairs, 1);
+ let names: Vec<&str> = model.child_rankings.component_rankings[0]
+ .ranked
+ .iter()
+ .map(|r| r.item.as_str())
+ .collect();
+ assert_eq!(
+ names,
+ vec!["https://slug.social/~/a", "https://slug.social/~/b"]
+ );
+ assert!(model.child_rankings.unranked_items.is_empty());
+ }
+
+ /// Legacy `https://slug.social/~/` spelling still resolves children under the real root key.
+ #[test]
+ fn item_page_model_normalizes_legacy_tilde_root_storage_url() {
+ let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
+ apply_ingest(
+ &mut reduced,
+ 1,
+ "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n~/x {x}\n",
+ );
+ let model = build_item_page_view_model(
+ &reduced,
+ &ScopeId::Public,
+ "https://slug.social/~/",
+ );
+ assert_eq!(model.child_rankings.unranked_items.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(
+ model.child_rankings.unranked_items[0].as_str(),
+ "https://slug.social/~/x"
+ );
+ }
}
diff --git a/server/src/path_types.rs b/server/src/path_types.rs
index 4c8075bbd488f1b9a5eda9e03ced83f6238c6d5e..361a9d446c9043cbdea5f060db2e8633c2fd9bf9 100644
--- a/server/src/path_types.rs
+++ b/server/src/path_types.rs
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
//! Re-exports — implementations live in `slug-types` (`paths` module).
-pub use slug_types::paths::{CanonicalItemUrl, RelativePath, TildePath};
+pub use slug_types::paths::{
+ tilde_http_path_to_canonical, CanonicalItemUrl, RelativePath, TildeHttpPathTail, TildePath,
+};
diff --git a/server/src/scope_rank.rs b/server/src/scope_rank.rs
index dc640848232b7e79142bfeeea3003c9023f84854..d656b2f0a0a3623ca6b234b746beaaca8ae6017d 100644
--- a/server/src/scope_rank.rs
+++ b/server/src/scope_rank.rs
@@ -149,9 +149,10 @@ pub fn build_rankings_for_item_set(content: &ContentState, items_in_scope: &[Can
/// Build connected-component rankings for direct children of parent_scope.
/// Matches the HTML garden view: multiple components, isolates, no-vote items.
pub fn build_children_rankings(content: &ContentState, parent: &CanonicalItemUrl) -> ChildrenRankings {
+ let parent = parent.clone().normalized_storage();
let items: Vec<CanonicalItemUrl> = content
.item_children
- .get(parent)
+ .get(&parent)
.map(|s| s.iter().cloned().collect())
.unwrap_or_default();
build_rankings_for_item_set(content, &items)
diff --git a/server/tests/integration.rs b/server/tests/integration.rs
index f9c218378f6a173e56ae1cec797b3c492986eac0..d4c5bfe9c6f1c71dc61878bd8c5e729b1b7c69ef 100644
--- a/server/tests/integration.rs
+++ b/server/tests/integration.rs
@@ -704,6 +704,62 @@ async fn test_private_room_post_links_use_private_garden_routes() {
assert!(garden_body.contains(&format!("/r/{room_short}/{room_slug}/t/garden-thread")));
}
+#[tokio::test]
+async fn test_private_room_garden_root_lists_top_level_tilde_children() {
+ let (addr, _tmp, _log, _handle) = create_test_server().await;
+ let client = reqwest::Client::builder()
+ .redirect(reqwest::redirect::Policy::none())
+ .build()
+ .unwrap();
+ let bearer = test_bearer();
+
+ let create = rpc_batch(
+ &client,
+ addr,
+ Some(&bearer),
+ serde_json::json!([{
+ "RoomCreate": { "slug": "garden-root-list" }
+ }]),
+ )
+ .await;
+ let room_id = create["results"][0]["result"]["RoomCreated"]["room_id"]
+ .as_str()
+ .unwrap()
+ .to_string();
+ let (room_short, room_slug) = room_id.split_once('/').unwrap();
+
+ let rpc = ui_post_ingest_rpc(
+ &room_id,
+ "ing",
+ "~/test1 {wow}\n~/test2 {wow2}\n~/test1 2:1 ~/test2 {because}\n",
+ );
+ let post = client
+ .post(format!("http://{addr}/ui"))
+ .header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {bearer}"))
+ .form(&[("__rpc__", rpc.as_str())])
+ .send()
+ .await
+ .unwrap();
+ assert_eq!(post.status(), reqwest::StatusCode::OK);
+
+ let root_page = client
+ .get(format!("http://{addr}/r/{room_short}/{room_slug}/~"))
+ .header("Authorization", format!("Bearer {bearer}"))
+ .send()
+ .await
+ .unwrap();
+ assert!(root_page.status().is_success());
+ let body = root_page.text().await.unwrap();
+
… preview truncated; 14,119 characters omittedB — c_fbeec5c4ad18 (tommy-mor)
message
[c7ef287e] Rank every eligible commit with the LLM council. Stop short-circuiting on a single contributor; pairwise-sort commits, roll scores up for emission payouts, and surface commit rankings on epoch pages. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
diff preview
diff --git a/constitution.py b/constitution.py
index 26ba130e885e0e69fb7874ca5c3f07f42100a150..71fc46b4c9a4d7a9ea7bf319860b0db1acc4a673 100644
--- a/constitution.py
+++ b/constitution.py
@@ -503,20 +503,22 @@ def _epochs_in_ledger() -> list[int]:
def build_pairwise_prompt(side_a: dict, side_b: dict) -> str:
- return f"""You are ranking contributions to an open source project.
-Compare these two sides (each may be one or more commits). Decide which side contributed more.
+ return f"""You are ranking individual git commits to an open source project.
+Compare these two commits. Decide which commit contributed more.
Return ONLY a JSON object: {{"winner": "A" or "B", "ratio": "N:M", "explanation": "..."}}
-Side A — commit messages:
+Side A — contributor: {side_a.get('contributor', '?')}
+Side A — commit message:
{side_a['message']}
-Side A — unified diffs (full patches):
+Side A — unified diff (full patch):
{side_a['diff']}
-Side B — commit messages:
+Side B — contributor: {side_b.get('contributor', '?')}
+Side B — commit message:
{side_b['message']}
-Side B — unified diffs (full patches):
+Side B — unified diff (full patch):
{side_b['diff']}"""
@@ -1518,16 +1520,28 @@ async def broadcast_js(js: str):
await queue.put(js)
-def _author_side_for_llm(author: str, author_commits: dict) -> dict:
- cs = author_commits[author]
+def _commit_side_for_llm(row: dict) -> dict:
+ oid = row["oid"]
+ short = oid.split(":", 1)[1][:8] if ":" in oid else oid[:8]
return {
- "message": "\n".join(f"[{c['sha']}] {c['message']}" for c in cs),
- "diff": "\n\n".join(f"=== {c['sha']} ===\n{c['diff']}" for c in cs),
- "commit_ids": [c["commit_id"] for c in cs],
- "contributor": author,
+ "message": f"[{short}] {row['message']}",
+ "diff": row["patch"] or "",
+ "commit_id": commit_id_for_oid(oid),
+ "contributor": row["contributor"],
+ "oid": oid,
}
+def _rollup_contributor_scores(
+ ordered: list[dict], commit_scores: list[Decimal]
+) -> dict[str, Decimal]:
+ totals: dict[str, Decimal] = {}
+ for row, score in zip(ordered, commit_scores):
+ contributor = row["contributor"]
+ totals[contributor] = totals.get(contributor, Decimal("0")) + score
+ return totals
+
+
def _find_judgment(comparison_id: str, model_id: str) -> dict | None:
for e in evidence_by_kind("llm.judgment"):
p = e.payload
@@ -1546,101 +1560,106 @@ def _find_ranking_models(ranking_run_id: str) -> list[str] | None:
async def rank_commits(commits: list[dict], *, epoch: int = -1):
+ """Pairwise-rank every eligible commit; roll scores up to contributors."""
if not commits:
return {}, [], {"ranking_run_id": "", "ranking_event_id": ""}
- commit_ids = sorted(commit_id_for_oid(row["oid"]) for row in commits)
+ ordered = sorted(commits, key=lambda r: r["oid"])
+ commit_ids = [commit_id_for_oid(row["oid"]) for row in ordered]
ranking_run_id = _content_id("rank", {
"epoch": epoch,
- "commit_ids": commit_ids,
+ "commit_ids": sorted(commit_ids),
})
- contributors = sorted(set(c["contributor"] for c in commits))
+ contributors = sorted({c["contributor"] for c in ordered})
- if len(contributors) == 1:
+ # Nothing to compare: a single commit (not a single contributor).
+ if len(ordered) == 1:
await append_evidence(epoch, "ranking.started", {
"ranking_run_id": ranking_run_id,
"commit_ids": commit_ids,
"contributors": contributors,
"models": [],
- "summary": f"ranking epoch {epoch}: single contributor",
+ "summary": f"ranking epoch {epoch}: single commit",
})
- ranking = {contributors[0]: Decimal("1")}
+ commit_ranking = {commit_ids[0]: "1"}
+ contributor_ranking = {ordered[0]["contributor"]: Decimal("1")}
completed = await append_evidence(epoch, "ranking.completed", {
"ranking_run_id": ranking_run_id,
"models": [],
- "ranking": {contributors[0]: "1"},
+ "commit_ranking": commit_ranking,
+ "contributor_ranking": {ordered[0]["contributor"]: "1"},
+ "ranking": {ordered[0]["contributor"]: "1"},
"judgment_ids": [],
- "summary": f"Only {contributors[0]} is eligible; rank is 1.0",
+ "summary": f"Only one eligible commit; {ordered[0]['contributor']} rank 1.0",
})
await broadcast_audit(
"ranking",
- f"Only {contributors[0]} is eligible; rank is 1.0",
+ f"Only one eligible commit; {ordered[0]['contributor']} rank 1.0",
progress=90,
phase="finalizing",
evidence_event_id=completed.event_id,
evidence_url=_evidence_url("event", completed.event_id),
links={"epoch": _evidence_url("epoch", str(epoch))},
)
- return ranking, [], {
+ return contributor_ranking, [], {
"ranking_run_id": ranking_run_id,
"ranking_event_id": completed.event_id,
}
if not (OPENROUTER_API_KEY or "").strip():
raise RuntimeError(
- "OPENROUTER_API_KEY is required when multiple contributors need ranking"
+ "OPENROUTER_API_KEY is required when multiple commits need ranking"
)
models = _find_ranking_models(ranking_run_id)
if models is None:
models = await fetch_top_models(n=3)
if not models:
- raise RuntimeError("no council models available for contributor ranking")
+ raise RuntimeError("no council models available for commit ranking")
await append_evidence(epoch, "ranking.started", {
"ranking_run_id": ranking_run_id,
"commit_ids": commit_ids,
"contributors": contributors,
"models": models,
- "summary": f"Council selected: {', '.join(models)}",
+ "summary": (
+ f"Council selected: {', '.join(models)} — "
+ f"{len(ordered)} commits"
+ ),
})
await broadcast_audit(
"council",
- f"Council selected: {', '.join(models)}",
+ f"Council selected: {', '.join(models)} — ranking {len(ordered)} commits",
progress=35,
phase="ranking",
)
await broadcast_js(exec_event(Three[Selector("#emission-log")][PREPEND][
- ["div.log-council", f"Council: {', '.join(models)} — {len(commits)} commits"]
+ ["div.log-council",
+ f"Council: {', '.join(models)} — {len(ordered)} commits"]
]))
- authors = contributors
- author_commits = {a: [] for a in authors}
- for row in sorted(commits, key=lambda r: r["oid"]):
- author_commits[row["contributor"]].append({
- "message": row["message"],
- "sha": row["oid"].split(":", 1)[1][:8],
- "diff": row["patch"],
- "commit_id": commit_id_for_oid(row["oid"]),
- })
-
+ sides = [_commit_side_for_llm(row) for row in ordered]
judgment_ids: list[str] = []
async def compare_fn(i, j):
- a1, a2 = authors[i], authors[j]
- side_a = _author_side_for_llm(a1, author_commits)
- side_b = _author_side_for_llm(a2, author_commits)
+ side_a, side_b = sides[i], sides[j]
+ label_a = f"{side_a['commit_id'][:16]} ({side_a['contributor']})"
+ label_b = f"{side_b['commit_id'][:16]} ({side_b['contributor']})"
prompt = build_pairwise_prompt(side_a, side_b)
comparison_material = {
"ranking_run_id": ranking_run_id,
"side_a": {
- "contributor": a1,
- "commit_ids": side_a["commit_ids"],
+ "contributor": side_a["contributor"],
+ "commit_id": side_a["commit_id"],
+ "commit_ids": [side_a["commit_id"]],
+ "oid": side_a["oid"],
"message": _bytes_blob(side_a["message"]),
"diff": _bytes_blob(side_a["diff"]),
},
"side_b": {
- "contributor": a2,
- "commit_ids": side_b["commit_ids"],
+ "contributor": side_b["contributor"],
+ "commit_id": side_b["commit_id"],
+ "commit_ids": [side_b["commit_id"]],
+ "oid": side_b["oid"],
"message": _bytes_blob(side_b["message"]),
"diff": _bytes_blob(side_b["diff"]),
},
@@ -1650,22 +1669,24 @@ async def rank_commits(commits: list[dict], *, epoch: int = -1):
comparison_material = {
**comparison_material,
"comparison_id": comparison_id,
- "summary": f"Comparing {a1} with {a2}",
+ "summary": f"Comparing {label_a} with {label_b}",
}
cmp_ev = await append_evidence(epoch, "comparison.input", comparison_material)
await broadcast_audit(
"comparison",
- f"Comparing {a1} with {a2}",
+ f"Comparing commits {label_a} vs {label_b}",
phase="ranking",
evidence_event_id=cmp_ev.event_id,
evidence_url=_evidence_url("comparison", comparison_id),
links={
"comparison": _evidence_url("comparison", comparison_id),
+ "commit_a": _evidence_url("commit", side_a["commit_id"]),
+ "commit_b": _evidence_url("commit", side_b["commit_id"]),
"epoch": _evidence_url("epoch", str(epoch)),
},
)
await broadcast_js(exec_event(Three[Selector("#emission-status")][MORPH][
- ["div#emission-status", f"Comparing {a1} vs {a2}…"]
+ ["div#emission-status", f"Comparing {label_a} vs {label_b}…"]
]))
results = []
for model in models:
@@ -1697,9 +1718,15 @@ async def rank_commits(commits: list[dict], *, epoch: int = -1):
jud_id = (existing or _find_judgment(comparison_id, model) or {}).get(
"judgment_id"
)
+ win_label = (
+ f"{sides[w]['commit_id'][:16]} ({sides[w]['contributor']})"
+ )
+ lose_label = (
+ f"{sides[l]['commit_id'][:16]} ({sides[l]['contributor']})"
+ )
await broadcast_audit(
"vote",
- f"{model}: {authors[w]} over {authors[l]} ({result['ratio']})",
+ f"{model}: {win_label} over {lose_label} ({result['ratio']})",
phase="ranking",
evidence_url=(
_evidence_url("judgment", jud_id) if jud_id else None
@@ -1714,8 +1741,8 @@ async def rank_commits(commits: list[dict], *, epoch: int = -1):
await broadcast_js(exec_event(Three[Selector("#emission-log")][PREPEND][
["div.log-vote",
["span.model", model], " — ",
- ["span.winner", authors[w]], f" beat ",
- ["span.loser", authors[l]], f" ({result['ratio']}) ",
+ ["span.winner", win_label], f" beat ",
+ ["span.loser", lose_label], f" ({result['ratio']}) ",
["span.explanation", result["explanation"]],
]
]))
@@ -1745,24 +1772,46 @@ async def rank_commits(commits: list[dict], *, epoch: int = -1):
["div#emission-status", label]
]))
- pairs = await pairwise_rank(len(authors), compare_fn, progress_fn)
+ pairs = await pairwise_rank(len(ordered), compare_fn, progress_fn)
if not pairs:
- ranking = {authors[0]: Decimal("1")} if authors else {}
+ commit_score_list = [Decimal("1")]
else:
scores = rank_centrality(pairs)
- ranking = {authors[i]: Decimal(str(scores[i])) for i in range(len(authors))}
… preview truncated; 12,453 characters omittedHardlinks — judgments / attempts / prompt
judgments
attempts
Prompt text is loaded only by the download route.