Side A adds a genuinely new, useful CLI feature (connectivity/density stats display) with well-defined formatting logic and unit tests verifying exact output strings. Side B makes a small behavioral tweak (splitting unranked siblings into individual groups) with a supporting test, but it's a narrower, more incremental UI refinement with less lasting architectural value.
constitution · epochs · watch · epoch 3
comparison
c_d6d339485601 (tommy-mor) vs c_3403e5929da7 (tommy-mor)
download prompt · raw event · cmp_d2bb1671ff24a9
council reasoning
B fixes lasting sibling-nav structure by putting each unranked isolate in its own group (with matching docs and a reducer-backed test), aligning HTML garden navigation with the intended component/isolate model. A only formats and prints connectivity stats already on PairResponse in the CLI, a useful but shallower presentational add-on.
Side B changes the sibling navigation logic so each unranked sibling becomes its own navigation group instead of lumping all unranked items together, matching the documented behavior and adding a regression test that verifies the grouping. Side A mainly adds CLI presentation of already-existing connectivity statistics with a formatter and tests, improving visibility but not changing the underlying project behavior.
sides
A — c_d6d339485601 (tommy-mor)
message
[14749a34] Show graph topology with pair suggestions Expose existing connectivity statistics in CLI output so voters can see sparse or disconnected scopes before adding an edge. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
diff preview
diff --git a/cli/src/main.rs b/cli/src/main.rs
index 70435b412188a151c5e89e842a5de57f7480ddf2..abb5a55b49f60fe28fbfd4ec02715cb94ea0b4ec 100644
--- a/cli/src/main.rs
+++ b/cli/src/main.rs
@@ -397,6 +397,29 @@ fn print_item_response(resp: &ItemResponse) {
}
}
+fn format_connectivity_stats(stats: &ConnectivityStats) -> String {
+ let density = if stats.pairs_possible == 0 {
+ 0.0
+ } else {
+ stats.pairs_voted as f64 / stats.pairs_possible as f64 * 100.0
+ };
+ let component_label = if stats.components == 1 { "component" } else { "components" };
+ let connection_status = if stats.comparisons_until_connected == 0 {
+ "connected".to_string()
+ } else {
+ let comparison_label = if stats.comparisons_until_connected == 1 {
+ "comparison"
+ } else {
+ "comparisons"
+ };
+ format!("{} {comparison_label} to connect", stats.comparisons_until_connected)
+ };
+ format!(
+ "graph: {} items, {}/{} pairs ({density:.1}% density), {} {component_label}, {connection_status}",
+ stats.items, stats.pairs_voted, stats.pairs_possible, stats.components,
+ )
+}
+
fn print_pair_response(resp: &PairResponse) {
println!("{} vs {}", resp.left, resp.right);
if let Some(b) = &resp.left_body {
@@ -413,6 +436,10 @@ fn print_pair_response(resp: &PairResponse) {
println!();
println!("threads: {}", resp.threads.iter().map(|t| format!("#{t}")).collect::<Vec<_>>().join(" "));
}
+ if let Some(stats) = &resp.connectivity {
+ println!();
+ println!("{}", format_connectivity_stats(stats));
+ }
println!();
println!("---");
println!("Before writing your comparison, talk to your human. Ask them about their relationship to these two items — which one has meant more to them, whether their perspective has changed over time, and where they land now. Listen to what they say. Then write a comparison that synthesizes their perspective with your own analysis. The best submissions on slug.social carry both voices — your reasoning and their experience.");
@@ -816,6 +843,43 @@ fn write_secret_file(name: &str, contents: &str) -> Result<()> {
Ok(())
}
+#[cfg(test)]
+mod tests {
+ use super::*;
+
+ #[test]
+ fn connectivity_stats_show_sparse_disconnected_graph() {
+ let stats = ConnectivityStats {
+ items: 9,
+ components: 3,
+ comparisons_until_connected: 2,
+ pairs_voted: 8,
+ pairs_possible: 36,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(
+ format_connectivity_stats(&stats),
+ "graph: 9 items, 8/36 pairs (22.2% density), 3 components, 2 comparisons to connect"
+ );
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn connectivity_stats_show_connected_graph() {
+ let stats = ConnectivityStats {
+ items: 4,
+ components: 1,
+ comparisons_until_connected: 0,
+ pairs_voted: 3,
+ pairs_possible: 6,
+ };
+
+ assert_eq!(
+ format_connectivity_stats(&stats),
+ "graph: 4 items, 3/6 pairs (50.0% density), 1 component, connected"
+ );
+ }
+}
+
async fn run_scoped(base: &str, room: &str, sub: ScopedCmd) -> Result<()> {
let room = room.trim();
let client = http_client()?;
B — c_3403e5929da7 (tommy-mor)
message
[65bce99f] sibling groups #130
diff preview
diff --git a/server/src/html/garden.rs b/server/src/html/garden.rs
index 82c1b4b4f36ea13a906035a1789ba893222b3695..e3c56d124ab7b0fa08c7f9ae736103e6b7cf5862 100644
--- a/server/src/html/garden.rs
+++ b/server/src/html/garden.rs
@@ -837,7 +837,8 @@ struct SiblingNavGroup {
links: Vec<SiblingNavLink>,
}
-/// Siblings under the same parent, grouped like child rankings (components then isolates).
+/// Siblings under the same parent: one group per ranking component (ordered list), then one
+/// group per isolated unranked sibling (each shows rank `1`, separated like components).
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
struct SiblingNavBar {
groups: Vec<SiblingNavGroup>,
@@ -890,15 +891,12 @@ fn build_sibling_nav(
groups.push(SiblingNavGroup { links });
}
}
- if !rankings.unranked_items.is_empty() {
- let links: Vec<SiblingNavLink> = rankings
- .unranked_items
- .iter()
- .map(|u| SiblingNavLink {
+ for u in &rankings.unranked_items {
+ groups.push(SiblingNavGroup {
+ links: vec![SiblingNavLink {
path: u.clone().normalized_storage().to_storage_string(),
- })
- .collect();
- groups.push(SiblingNavGroup { links });
+ }],
+ });
}
let sibling_total: usize = groups.iter().map(|g| g.links.len()).sum();
if sibling_total <= 1 {
@@ -1541,6 +1539,29 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(nav.groups[1].links.len(), 1);
}
+ #[test]
+ fn sibling_nav_splits_each_unranked_into_its_own_group() {
+ let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
+ apply_ingest(
+ &mut reduced,
+ 1,
+ "@00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:test:local/test\n\
+ ~/topic {topic body}\n\
+ ~/topic/a {alpha}\n\
+ ~/topic/b {beta}\n\
+ ~/topic/c {gamma}\n\
+ ~/topic/d {delta}\n\
+ {a beats b}\n ~/topic/a 2:1 ~/topic/b\n",
+ );
+
+ let model = build_item_page_view_model(&reduced, &ScopeId::Public, "~/topic/a");
+ let nav = model.sibling_nav.expect("expected sibling nav");
+ assert_eq!(nav.groups.len(), 3);
+ assert_eq!(nav.groups[0].links.len(), 2);
+ assert_eq!(nav.groups[1].links.len(), 1);
+ assert_eq!(nav.groups[2].links.len(), 1);
+ }
+
#[test]
fn item_page_model_builds_ranked_child_components() {
let mut reduced = ReducerState::default();
Hardlinks — judgments / attempts / prompt
judgments
attempts
Prompt text is loaded only by the download route.