constitution · epochs · watch · epoch 3
llm.judgment
ev_317bdb5a9bf9df9a81e499fa57003c34e79bbcbafb9fd84da764c5c7a5e374fe
kindllm.judgment
epoch3
recorded_at_ms1784430321298
previous_event_sha256e091c366f1a1dbf302f85e2216286fb37d6ea3158e00b3f345d3ef5683574cf9
schema_version2
links
- comparison_id: cmp_cecb44d8b51219ee034e0329557ec189d594484dc773a49d6d11d83e8253593a
- attempt_id: att_05c3db6c112dd0c39cd43b57596939dfedd352d27f68237f8d7153ba0eec4864
- judgment_id: jud_c7046c611672df83b28b6386c64ec17f53a158a5bd784b6e8680235860a6a10c
- epoch 3
payload
{
"attempt_id": "att_05c3db6c112dd0c39cd43b57596939dfedd352d27f68237f8d7153ba0eec4864",
"comparison_id": "cmp_cecb44d8b51219ee034e0329557ec189d594484dc773a49d6d11d83e8253593a",
"explanation": "Side A delivers a working, tested feature (RocksDB-backed entity payload offloading and streaming event log replay) with new module, real tests, integration test updates, and a genuine startup-RAM benefit; the vendored 'durable' crate is a real dependency addition despite the noisy Cargo.lock diffs. Side B is a large but purely mechanical rename/refactor (CanonicalItemUrl -> ItemId) that touches many files without adding new capability, and much of the diff is boilerplate churn plus deletion of a stale plan.md. A's change is more load-bearing (actual memory/behavior improvement) versus B's cosmetic-but-wide type rename.",
"judgment_id": "jud_c7046c611672df83b28b6386c64ec17f53a158a5bd784b6e8680235860a6a10c",
"model_id": "~anthropic/claude-sonnet-latest",
"ratio": "70:30",
"summary": "~anthropic/claude-sonnet-latest: A (70:30)",
"winner": "A"
}