constitution · epochs · watch · epoch 3
llm.judgment
ev_5e537b95f12ee1dd37f8f6d017b35d26b02d6e222cb3f9dd11835e8ad5ae39bb
kindllm.judgment
epoch3
recorded_at_ms1784431582366
previous_event_sha25655407888247c780fec113ab0b848636ac0a1315041d5cddd9e44c19c5ea13c0c
schema_version2
links
- comparison_id: cmp_8e20e5b6ba64d7568df71a766a44b0090bee35ccf47e3fb8925626b031fdeba1
- attempt_id: att_3778254a0eb54a9bd0e71adb910bb512f13cb8892e70613547f8cd110c46d4c3
- judgment_id: jud_805ce688ad3c4b8f056bfcd62a3e24b8606da33ea5e5f86825b85ca04aa4efc2
- epoch 3
payload
{
"attempt_id": "att_3778254a0eb54a9bd0e71adb910bb512f13cb8892e70613547f8cd110c46d4c3",
"comparison_id": "cmp_8e20e5b6ba64d7568df71a766a44b0090bee35ccf47e3fb8925626b031fdeba1",
"explanation": "Side B implements a real feature with security implications (multi-provider OAuth linking, UUID-canonical identity, conflict handling for already-linked accounts, private provider visibility) with backing unit tests and mock-server test infrastructure updates. Side A is mostly plumbing (threading theme/jar/uri params through many handlers) plus a room-URL-prefixing helper, which is useful but lower-stakes UI/URL-formatting churn compared to B's identity/auth model change.",
"judgment_id": "jud_805ce688ad3c4b8f056bfcd62a3e24b8606da33ea5e5f86825b85ca04aa4efc2",
"model_id": "~anthropic/claude-sonnet-latest",
"ratio": "6:4",
"summary": "~anthropic/claude-sonnet-latest: B (6:4)",
"winner": "B"
}