c_0e1a063d5849f5a7ff

Side A adds a genuinely useful diagnostic script (sample-fixture) and cleanly refactors the monolithic forum.rs into cohesive submodules (access, ingest, nav, new_thread, room_members), improving maintainability with minimal behavioral risk. Side B merely deletes an entire feature (the tree view UI, its routes, and its well-covered test suite) with no replacement or migration path, which removes functionality and prior test coverage rather than adding lasting value.

A modularizes the live forum HTML stack into focused modules (nav, ingest, access, new_thread, room_members), which is lasting structure on core product code, plus adds a reusable sample-fixture helper. B only deletes the abandoned tree UI (~819 lines) and its exports—valuable cleanup, but pure subtraction without improving design of what remains.

Side A performs a substantial architectural refactor by splitting the forum code into focused modules (such as access, ingest, navigation, room members, and new-thread handling), while preserving behavior and introducing reusable helpers like ThreadNav and permission checks. It also adds a useful developer profiling script (`sample-fixture`) for diagnosing fixture processes, whereas Side B primarily removes the entire tree feature (`tree.rs`) and its exports, which is mostly feature deletion rather than an enduring improvement to the codebase.

Side A merely removes an entire dead feature (tree.rs), which is a cleanup but adds no new functionality and discards ~800 lines of implemented logic/tests without replacement. Side B adds a small, real feature (view count display on vote compare pages) with proper wiring through layout functions and includes new integration test assertions verifying the behavior, making it a positive, tested contribution.

B adds a real product behavior—plumbing view counts into the vote-compare page via layout_full_bleed_chromeless and locking it in with integration assertions—whereas A only deletes the entire tree module and its exports with no replacement design. A small tested feature addition outlasts pure feature removal for project value.

Side B fixes a functional omission by wiring the existing view-count mechanism into the fullscreen vote page: it computes the canonical view key, passes the count through `layout_full_bleed_chromeless`, and adds integration tests verifying the displayed count increments from 1 to 2. Side A simply removes the entire `tree` HTML module and its exports without showing a replacement or migration, so the patch appears to eliminate a substantial feature rather than add lasting functionality.